Board Certification in Pediatric Dentistry: Once it
Represented the Pursuit of Excellence
Volume 2 - Issue 4
John E Nathan1-6* DDS, MDS, FAAPD, MASDC
-
Author Information
Open or Close
- 1Adjunct Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Alabama, Birmingham and Case Western Reserve University, USA
- 2Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Otolaryngology and Dentistry, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, USA
- 3Diplomate, American Board of Pediatric Dentistry, USA
- 4Fellow, American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, USA
- 5Fellow and Master, American Society of Dentistry for Children, USA
- 6In private practice limited to pediatric dentistry, USA
*Corresponding author:
John E Nathan, DDS, MDS, FAAPOD, MASDC, Adjunct Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University
of Alabama, Birmingham and Case Western Reserve University, Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Otolaryngology and
Dentistry, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Diplomate, American Board of Pediatric Dentistry, Fellow, American
Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, Fellow and Master, American Society of Dentistry for Children, In private practice limited to pediatric
dentistry, USA
Received:April 14, 2018; Published: April 25, 2018
DOI: 10.32474/IPDOAJ.2018.02.000146
Full Text
PDF
To view the Full Article Peer-reviewed Article PDF
Abstract
The scope and changes to the examination format for Board Certification by the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry has
successfully achieved the goal of enticing and attracting significantly greater numbers of AAPD members to pursue and complete
the board process. Unlike earlier times (prior to 2002), when only 15% of its membership secured Diplomate status, changes
in the examination format that reduced the process from four extensive and demanding components to two much abbreviated
elements, approximately 80% of its membership has now pursued and achieved certification. For better or worse, standards
have been radically modified from that of elite and prestigious to that of minimally acceptable. Movement in the direction of
making the examination process more attractive and simplified has become the rule rather than the exception. The bar has been
sufficiently lowered by the nature of the examination changes. In so doing the demand and requirements for pursuit of knowledge
has diminished. A priority for expanded membership at a significant cost has overshadowed the pursuit of excellence among the
masses. The old school of thought envisioned inherent motivations to continually seek excellence and the most comprehensive level
of knowledge. Its opposing school determined that inclusion of those unwilling or unable to master the highest level of competency
remained deserving of recognition. Among the dilemma created by this shift in priorities is that once one fractionates the degree of
difficulty and challenge to a lesser level, it is unlikely the direction can be reversed any time soon.
Abstract|
Introduction|
Summary|