email   Email Us: info@lupinepublishers.com phone   Call Us: +1 (914) 407-6109   57 West 57th Street, 3rd floor, New York - NY 10019, USA

Lupine Publishers Group

Lupine Publishers

ISSN: 2637-6652

Modern Approaches in Oceanography and Petrochemical Sciences

Mini Review (ISSN: 2637-6652)

The Perception of Fluctuations of Cell Velocity as a Possible Means of Overcoming Sedimentation by Motile Sea-Plankton Microorganisms Volume 2 - Issue 3

Pundyak Oleh*

  • Botanical Garden of Ukrainian National Forestry University, Ukraine

Received: December 21, 2018;   Published: January 04, 2019

Corresponding author: Pundyak Oleh, Botanical Garden of Ukrainian National Forestry University, Ukraine.

DOI: 10.32474/MAOPS.2019.02.000139

Abstract PDF

Abstract

A model for overcoming the gravity by cells of wide range of motile sea-plankton microorganisms without gravity perception or antipredator behavior is proposed here. It is based on the assuming that the cells are able to detect thermal fluctuations of their velocities. In our model the cell locomotion force linearly depends on the cell velocity fluctuations causing especial type of gravikinesis. According to equations of the cell movement, sedimentation of the organisms may be considerably overcome.

Keywords:Microplankton; Picoplankton; Sedimentation; Gravikinesis

Introduction

The speed of some microorganisms depends on their orientation within the gravity field (excluding buoyancy of the whole cells). This phenomenon is called gravikinesis. Physiological mechanisms of gravikinesis have been well examined and described by Hemmersbach & Häder et al, [1] for example. It is expressed by the existence of certain cell receptors accepting gravistimulus and, through signaling chains, causing the change of cell motor work. The physical aspect of gravikinesis might be expressed by an anisotropic interaction of the microorganisms with the water medium. Recent calculations [2] supported our hypothesis that the physical aspect of gravikinesis can occur in bacterial and also in eukaryotic motile sea-picoplankton cells. According to our mentioned calculations the physical aspect of gravikinesis can be visible only in the case of high concentrations of bacteria without antipredator behavior (AB) equaling or bigger than 108 cells m-3 in consequence of friction anisotropy of co-existing microorganisms with high level of AB. Thus, a question can be raised: whether motile sea-plankton microorganisms in low concentrations can overcome gravity without any special cellular mechanism for gravity perception, as it has been shown for asymmetric microplankton [3-5] or for sea-picoplankton with antipredator behavior [2] ? We have tried to answer this question positively taking into account the existing of mechanosensitive channels, which can detect the changes of cell membrane tension linked with the changes of friction force during fluctuations of cell velocity [6]. Let us show the possible result when an averaged fluctuation force, which acts on the cells with ability to detect the thermal fluctuations of their velocities, is considerable in comparison with buoyance force. As the velocity fluctuations are very ephemeral (their duration for plankton organisms with dimensions up to 10-5 m does not exceed 10-5 s), they can be detected as the difference between the real cell velocities and averaged ones:

Lupinepublishers-openaccess-Oceanography-Petrochemicalsciences

where Lupinepublishers-openaccess-Oceanography-Petrochemicalsciences are the cell velocity fluctuations. Let us consider such a velocity fluctuations detection in our model system. For this goal let us transform equations (1), (2), (3) [2] having considered equation (9) [2]. Thus, analogically to equation (11) [2] we obtain:

Lupinepublishers-openaccess-Oceanography-Petrochemicalsciences

where β is the coefficient of the cell velocity fluctuations detection. If β =const , then it does not influence on the sedimentation rate. But it is natural to consider that the receptors of the velocity fluctuations detect only scalar velocity deviations. So, in our model |β| =constand when Δx′ change its sign, β does it too. There appear two variants: with positive and negative values of β ⋅Δx′ . The first corresponds to the inhibition of the cell motor as the respond on the deviations. The latter – to the stimulation. Thus, according to [2] during the averaging of equation (2) for Δx′ , averaged fluctuation force (let us call it diffusional force) may be not equal zero:

Lupinepublishers-openaccess-Oceanography-Petrochemicalsciences

Thus, formula (18) [2] changes as

Lupinepublishers-openaccess-Oceanography-Petrochemicalsciences

where dx’ and dy’,z’ are the dimensions of the particles along the axes X’ and Y’ or Z’ (of orthogonal coordinate system bounded with the axis (X’), along which the locomotion force always acts) correspondingly; Dx’ and Dy’,z’ are coefficients of diffusion along the axis X’ and Y’ or Z’ correspondingly. It is natural to assume that β ≥ hx’. Let us consider that

ξ ≈10.

Thus, according to all calculations done in [2] not only for picoplanktonic (as it was shown for the cells with antipredator behavior) but for a part of microplanktonic organisms (with the dimensions from 2·10-6 m up to 8·10-6 m) the diffusional force may have a considerable value in comparison with buoyant force. Thus, we can say, that picoplanktonic organisms and the part of microplanktonic ones with their dimensions up to 8·10-6 m, which have the cell velocity fluctuations receptors can considerably decrease sedimentation without any special receptors of gravity. We also can conclude that, though poorly studied generally and especially in the world of motile picoplankton and microplankton, the receptors of cell velocity fluctuations can also serve as an adaptation to overcome sedimentation. This finding may stimulate further research in this field.

References

  1. Hemmersbach R, Häder, DP (1999) Graviresponses of certain ciliates and flagellates. FASEB J 13: 69-75.
  2. Pundyak O (2017) Possible means of overcoming sedimentation by motile sea-picoplankton cells. Oceanologia 59 (2): 108-112.
  3. Hagen B, Kümmel F, Wittkowski R, Takagi D, Löwen H, et al. (2014) Gravitaxis of asymmetric self-propelled colloidal particles. Nat Comm 5(9): 1-7.
  4. Kessler JO (1985) Hydrodynamic focusing of motile algal cells. Nature 313 (1): 218-220.
  5. Roberts AM, Deacon FM (2002) Gravitaxis in motile micro-organisms: The role of fore-aft body asymmetry. J Fluid Mech 452(1): 405-423.
  6. Rasmussen T (2016) How do mechanosensitive channels sense membrane tension? Biochem Soc Trans 44(4): 1019-1025.
Close

Online Submission System

Drag and drop files here

or

Browse Files
( For multiple files submission, zip them in a single file to submit. For file zipping software Download )