Thoughts on the Reference Range of Laboratory Tests
Volume 1 - Issue 5
Shi-min Zhang1 and Ying Lan2*
-
Author Information
Open or Close
- 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical
College China
- 2State Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
*Corresponding author:
Ying Lan, State Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
Received:February 17, 2020; Published: June 17, 2020
DOI: 10.32474/CTBM.2020.01.000121
Full Text
PDF
To view the Full Article Peer-reviewed Article PDF
Abstract
This article discusses the value research data in Guan’s paper published on medRxiv, February 9, 2020. In terms of experimental
data, the preprinted paper is by far the largest sample number of 2019-new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infected patients. Including
552 hospitals from 31 provinces in China as of January 29, 2020, a total of 1,099 cases. Laboratory evaluations include multiple
blood cell counts, blood chemistry, coagulation tests, liver and kidney function, electrolytes, C-reactive protein,
Keywords: Reference range; 2019-nCoV, SARS-CoV-2, 2019-nCoV ARD, COVID-19
Abstract|
Introduction|
Methods and Results|
Discussion|
Acknowledgement|
References|