Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Chronic
Lumbar Facets Arthropathy; Bipolar Radiofrequency at
Two Points Versus Monopolar Radiofrequency at One
Point - A Randomized Control Trial
Volume 1 - Issue 4
Wael M Abdelkhalek1, Mohamed M Hashim2, Adel M Shaaban3 and Dhafir A Alkhudairi4*
-
Author Information
Open or Close
- 1Senior registrar of Anaesthesia & Pain management, King Hamad University Hospital, Bahrain
- 2Lecturer of Anaesthesia, ICU and Pain management, faculty of medicine, Cairo university, Egypt
- 3Specialist Anaesthesia and Pain management, Middle East Hospital, Bahrain
- 4Head, Department of Anaesthesia, consultant of anaesthesia and Pain management, King Hamad University Hospital, Kingdom of Bahrain
*Corresponding author:
Dhafir A Alkhudairi, Department of Anaesthesia, King Hamad University Hospital, Kingdom of Bahrain
Received: May 30, 2019; Published:June 07, 2019
DOI: 10.32474/GJAPM.2018.01.000118
Full Text
PDF
To view the Full Article Peer-reviewed Article PDF
Abstract
Background: Radiofrequency (RF) ablation has reported variable results in the treatment of facet joint pain; therefore, more
robust evidence for RF ablation for the management of facet joint pain is needed to establish the optimum. This study compares the
effectiveness of two different techniques of applying RF ablation, monopolar vs bipolar, to the medial branch of the dorsal nerve.
Methods: After diagnostic facet joint injection with lidocaine 2%, patients who demonstrated an improvement in Visual
Analogue Scale (VAS) score of more than 50%, were divided into two groups with a total 50 subjects (25patients in each group).
Group 1 would receive monopolar RF at one point, group 2 would receive bipolar RF at 2 points. The patients in each group were
evaluated in 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months’ intervals, using the VAS score. Overall patient satisfaction was evaluated by
the patient satisfaction score.
Results: There was no significant difference in VAS score between the groups (‘between subject test’ p = 0.224). The median
initial pain score was 8 [8-10] and was comparable between group one and group two (9 [8-10] and 8 [8-10], respectively; p =
0.338). The patient satisfaction score was comparable between group one, and two (6 [5-7] and 7 [5-8], respectively; p = 0.170).
Conclusions: The use of bipolar technique in comparison to Monopolar technique for RF neurotomy of the medial branch of the
dorsal nerve did not add more benefits to the patients in decreasing pain scores at different timings.
Keywords: Back Pain; Facet Joint Arthropathy; Medial Branch Radiofrequency; Radio Frequency Ablation; Treatment;
Zygapophyseal Joint
Abstract|
Introduction|
Materials and Methods|
Statistical Analysis|
Results|
Discussion|
Conclusion|
References|