ISSN: 2637-6628
Javier López Pisón* and Marta Marín Andres
Received: September 23, 2020; Published: October 01, 2020
Corresponding author: Javier López Pisón, Chief of Section Neurometabolic Section, Pediatric Department, Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
DOI: 10.32474/OJNBD.2020.04.000191
We pediatric neurologists treat many children with neurodevelopmental disorders and/or epilepsy. The pharmacological treatment of epilepsy, so often ineffective and with many side effects, is not commonly discussed. However, the pharmacological treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders, particularly of attention deficit disorders either with or without hyperactivity (ADD/ADHD) is very much discussed, despite so much evidence regarding its effectiveness. Pharmacological treatment of epilepsy is not a cure, nor in many cases does the long-term evolution of epilepsy or neurodevelopment change. Childhood epilepsy is refractory to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in around twenty per cent of cases. Some AEDs can cause or worsen ADD/ADHD symptoms and in some cases should be discontinued [1]. The certainty of epilepsy diagnosis and the frequency, intensity, duration and impact of seizures should be valued to establish treatment. It is impor
tant to make sure that treatment is well tolerated and to be alert to any possible side effects, especially those affecting attention, behavior or school performance.
ADD/ADHD figures among children with epilepsy are between 16.7% and 50%, influenced by AEDs, the type of epilepsy and the underlying brain impairment [2,3]. In certain cases, attention deficit may improve with treatment for epilepsy but, if this is not the case, treatment for ADD/ADHD should be considered. There are numerous references to the effectiveness and safety of treating children with epilepsy and ADD/ADHD with stimulants [3,4]. When making decisions regarding the treatment of children with epilepsy, it should be considered that in the long term, the child and his neurodevelopment are more important than epilepsy. Neurodevelopmental disorders, that include intellectual disability
(ID), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), ADD/ADHD, tic disorders and learning disability, have a high prevalence and a significant personal, family and social impact. They can occur isolated or associated, and are associated with various brain problems, both inherited or acquired [5].
ID, ASD and ADD/ADHD and many cases of other neurodevelopmental disorders share executive brain dysfunction. Executive brain dysfunction is associated with a lot of neurological pathology in children: neurodevelopmental disorders, epilepsy, acquired brain injury [6], neurofibromatosis type 1 [7], tuberous sclerosis [8], Duchenne muscular dystrophy [9], cerebral palsy, or neurometabolic diseases . Cognitive and attention functions are not located solely in the frontal lobe and they depend on adequate neuronal circuits throughout the brain [10], which explains the high prevalence of ADD/ADHD in different encephalopathies .
No diagnosis can exclude ADD/ADHD. Executive brain dysfunction occurs in people of normal intelligence, with ID and with high capacities. It can be associated with ASD and Asperger syndrome. It can be accompanied by tics, oppositional-defiant disorder, depression, anxiety and with learning disorders. It can cause headaches.
ADHD goes undiagnosed in a considerable number of children and adolescents [11], particularly in girls and women [6].
Neurodevelopmental disorders are not categorical diagnoses and are evolving; it is well known that over the years they tend to improve the autistic characteristics [12] and nuclear symptoms of ADD/ADHD. Therefore, prognosis is uncertain in neurodevelopmental disorders, more so with the youngest children. Prognosis is also influenced by therapeutic interventions, including drug treatment. Executive brain dysfunction has effective
drug treatment. Psychostimulants are effective in 80% of cases of
ADD/ADHD. They help regulate the correct functioning of brain
neurotransmitters, necessary for the executive brain function.
Response can be very positive and can be observed from the
beginning of treatment: changes the child’s life, improves school
performance, social relationships and family coexistence, time
spent on sport and hobbies, and self-esteem. If stimulants fail to
work or are not well tolerated, other drugs exist that can be effective
and need to be tested.
The NICE Guideline of 2018 indicates that ADHD should be
considered in all age groups with symptom criteria adjusted for
age-appropriate changes in behaviour and that medication must be
offered to children aged 5 years and over if their ADHD symptoms
are still causing a persistent significant impairment in at least one
domain after environmental modifications have been implemented
[6].
The Clinical Practice Guideline from the American Academy
of Pediatrics of 2019 indicates that the pediatrician should initiate
an evaluation for ADHD for any child or adolescent over 4 years
old who presents academic or behavioral problems and symptoms
of inattention, hyperactivity, or impulsivity, that treatments
available have good evidence of efficacy and a lack of treatment
means risking impaired outcomes, and that diagnostic criteria for
ADHD can be applied to preschool-aged children (4-6 Years). The
American Guide also advises caution with treatment for children 4
to 5 years of age as evidence suggests that the rate of metabolizing
methylphenidate is slower and a child’s response to stimulants is
variable and unpredictable [11]. However, contrary to all evidence,
over 20% of our patients diagnosed with ADD/ADHD received no
pharmacological treatment, and 30% delayed the start of treatment
an average of 20 months [5]. Once treatment is initiated, adherence
is high [5,13].
A person’s decision to start, change or stop treatment may be
influenced by media coverage, teachers, family members, friends
and differing opinion on the validity of a diagnosis of ADHD
[6]. Cortes-Saladefont, et al. indicate that neurodevelopmental
disorders, such as epilepsy and movement disorders, are frequently
a sign of synaptopathies and there are treatment prospects aimed
at regulating the function of neurotransmitters in the synaptic
vesicles [14]. We already have drugs that improve brain executive
function. It is our responsibility to offer them
Bio chemistry
University of Texas Medical Branch, USADepartment of Criminal Justice
Liberty University, USADepartment of Psychiatry
University of Kentucky, USADepartment of Medicine
Gally International Biomedical Research & Consulting LLC, USADepartment of Urbanisation and Agricultural
Montreal university, USAOral & Maxillofacial Pathology
New York University, USAGastroenterology and Hepatology
University of Alabama, UKDepartment of Medicine
Universities of Bradford, UKOncology
Circulogene Theranostics, EnglandRadiation Chemistry
National University of Mexico, USAAnalytical Chemistry
Wentworth Institute of Technology, USAMinimally Invasive Surgery
Mercer University school of Medicine, USAPediatric Dentistry
University of Athens , GreeceThe annual scholar awards from Lupine Publishers honor a selected number Read More...