email   Email Us: phone   Call Us: +1 (914) 407-6109   57 West 57th Street, 3rd floor, New York - NY 10019, USA

Lupine Publishers Group

Lupine Publishers

  Submit Manuscript

ISSN: 2637-6628

Online Journal of Neurology and Brain Disorders

Editorial(ISSN: 2637-6628)

CeA & BNST: D2R &Impulsivity Volume 3 - Issue 2

Divya R1* and Ashok V2

  • 1Department of Physiology, Dr MGR Medical university, India
  • 2Department of Biochemistry, Dr MGR Medical university, India

Received: September 20, 2019;   Published: September 25, 2019

Corresponding author: Divya R, Assistant professor, Department of Physiology, Karpagam Faculty of medical sciences and research, TN Dr MGR Medical university, India

DOI: 10.32474/OJNBD.2019.03.000156

Abstract PDF



Impulsivity is defined as a predisposition to performa with slight or no forethought or deliberation of the consequences and is a most important element of several psychiatric ailments [1]. It transpires in a various form, which can be branded as:
a) Choice Impulsivity: Acting to attain a less important instant reward against a superior late reward.
b) Impulsive Action: The incapability to prevent an initiated action.
c) Reflection Impulsivity: A deed lacking sufficient evaluation of information.
d) Attention Impulsivity: Diminished capacity to persevere a germane behaviour avoiding other distractions [2].

Impulsivity and addiction

The pathological trademark of addiction disorder is Impulsivity. It is principally thought that Addiction can be caused due to diminished inhibitory control [3]. Impulsivity is closely associated with drug dependence and abuse. The tendency to pick a subordinate, but instantaneous, reward over a significant outcome which occurs late. Addiction is nothing but the discrepancies in regulating the inhibitions due to disability to properly constrain actions or thoughts that lead to impetuous actions. There is a clear overlap amongst addiction and impulsivity, which leads to the conclusion that there is an overlapping neurobiological mechanism on which these processes depend on. Undeniably, it is suggested that the dopaminergic transmission and corticostriatal system is the communal neurobiological substrate for these behaviours. Addiction is demonstrated by various studies that display a noteworthy reduction in striatal dopamine transmission that is determined as pre-synaptic dopamine release and dopamine D2 receptor binding [2].


Amygdala is modest in dimensions, as it is includes many interrelated nuclei burrowed in the deeper parts of temporal lobe. BLA is the basolateral complex of the amygdala that is constitutes BM-basomedial, LA- lateral, BA- basal cell groups. principal neurons of BLA are glutamatergic and inhibitory interneuron. CeA is the central nucleus of amygdala which consists of CeL the lateral subdivision and CeM the medial subdivision. CeA neurons are principally GABAergic. the CeL projects to CeM. Intercalated cells are the primary source of inhibition is a group of interconnected GABAergic neurons, connecting the BLA and CeA [4].

CeA: Central Amygdala

Extended amygdala: The neurotransmission inside the intangible macrostructure in the basal forebrain is accredited to several long-standing emotional conflicts connected to alcohol abuse and addiction. The major constituents of the extended amygdala are the CeA, BNST (bed nucleus of stria terminalis, and NAc (nucleus accumbens) [5]. The inputs of extended amygdala include afferents from hippocampus, limbic cortices Basolateral Amygdala (BLA). They also demonstrate similarity in morphology and has overlapping and interconnected neural circuits. Whereas the primary outputs to various areas that produce behaviours associated with anxiety and fear such as lateral brain stem regions and hypothalamus. The extended amygdala constitutes the neurotransmitters connected with positive reinforcing effects of abusal of drugs and the key apparatuses of the brain stress systems connected to negative reinforcement of dependence [6]. The CeA causes incorporation of anxiety and fear related information. it is also responsible for reward-related actions. These behaviours are modulated by Dopamine 2 Receptors (D2Rs) located in the CeA [1].

BNST: A constituent of extended amygdala the BNST controls various physiological functions such as anxiety, goal-directed behaviours, feeding behaviour, fear formation. The interaction between the stress, anxiety, and reward systems are mediated by the Central Amygdala projections to the BNST [1].

D2R (Dopamine 2 Receptor): CeL the lateral nucleus of the CeA and capsular nucleus of the CeA has the D2R-expressing neurons. D2R mediates the signalling in CeA which influences the VTA and BNST. The Impulsive behaviour is controlled by D2R-expressing neurons of the CeA → BNST pathway. The mechanism underlying impulsivity is the dysfunctional dopaminergic neurotransmission, in D2R. Impulsive behaviors are controlled by the dopaminergic signalling in the CeA which is the central neural locus that acts via D2R-positive neurons that projects from the CeA to the BNST [1].


The important point of convergence for the neuroadaptation behaviours is the synaptic transmission and the special neuronal circuitry in the CeA-BNST. Research in this fundamental system (CeA) is the goal for therapeutic testing for impulsivity and addiction can be projected by effects of drugs on synaptic transmission. Comprehensive clinical trials are mandatory to explicate the mechanism of CeA-BNST circuitry regulating the impulsivity. This will form the foundation for therapeutic interventions targeted over addiction and impulsivity allied neuropsychiatric disorders.


  1. Kim B, Yoon S, Nakajima R, Hyo Jin Lee, Hee Jeong Lim, et al. (2018) Dopamine D2 receptor-mediated circuit from the central amygdala to the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis regulates impulsive behaviour. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(45): 10730-10739.
  2. Trifilieff P, Martinez D (2013) Imaging addiction: D2 receptors and dopamine signalling in the striatum as biomarkers for impulsivity. Neuropharmacology 76: 498-509.
  3. Xie C, Shao Y, Fu L, Goveas J, Ye E, et al. (2010) Identification of hyperactive intrinsic amygdala network connectivity associated with impulsivity in abstinent heroin addicts. Behav Brain Res 216(2): 639-646.
  4. Janak PH, Tye KM (2015) From circuits to behaviour in the amygdala. Nature 517(7534): 284-292.
  5. Roberto M, Gilpin NW, Siggins GR (2012) The central amygdala and alcohol: role of γ-aminobutyric acid, glutamate, and neuropeptides. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2(12): 012195.
  6. Koob GF (2009) Brain stress systems in the amygdala and addiction. Brain Res 1293: 61-75.