email   Email Us: phone   Call Us: +1 (914) 407-6109   57 West 57th Street, 3rd floor, New York - NY 10019, USA

Lupine Publishers Group

Lupine Publishers

  Submit Manuscript

ISSN: 2637-4706

Drug Designing & Intellectual Properties International Journal

Research Article(ISSN: 2637-4706)

Survey of Mite Species Inhabiting Animal Production Farm at Sohag Governorate, with Checklist of Mites Existing Manure and Dung Hills in Egypt Volume 3 - Issue 4

Desoky ASSa1*, Ahameda HEM2 and Erakyb SA2

  • 1Department of Plant Protection, Sohag University, Egypt
  • 2Department of Plant Protection, Assiut University, Egypt

Received: April 24, 2020;   Published:June 02, 2020

Corresponding author: Desoky ASSa, Department of Plant Protection, Sohag University, Egypt

DOI: 10.32474/DDIPIJ.2020.03.000169

Abstract PDF


The present study was carried out in the newly established animal production farm of the Faculty of Agriculture, Sohag University, in order to survey the mite species inhabiting manure and dung hills. The study showed the occurrence of six species of mites (i.e., Macrocheles solimani Hafez, El-Badry & Nasr, 1985; Macrocheles merdarius (Berlese, 1889); Uropodiaspis aegyptiacusAhmed, 1984; Siteroptes manure Soliman & Kandeel, 1986; Histiostoma arcuatus Negm, 2007 and Hormosianoetus mahunkai Eraky & Shoker, 1993. The checklist reported 120 mite species pertaining to 18 families and 53 genera. Interestingly, the largest diversities of mite species were recorded to the Mesostigmata (50 species) and the Acaridida (45 species). Therefore, it is clear that, there are large numbers of mite pests (Acaridida species) inhabiting manure in Egypt, that may be transferred to agricultural crops when manure used in cultivation. On the other side, the diversity of the predatory mite species should be taken into consideration to establish control programs by using these species as a biological control agent to control the pest ones [1-15].

Keywords: Mites; Sohag; Egypt; Manure; Dung hills; Survey


The Acarididia Latreille, 1802is a diverse group of mites specialized for exploiting spatially or temporarily restricted habitats. The modified deutonymph (hypopus) in this group is specialized for dispersal and resisting adverse environmental conditions (OC'onnor, 1982) [16-25]. Dispersal between habitat patches is affected by phoretic association between the specialized deutonymphs of the Acaridida mites and the host, which may be either another arthropod or a vertebrate (Hughes, 1976; OC'onnor, 1991; Houck and OC'onnor, 1991). Most species are living as saprophytic and fungivores in soil, litter, debris and organic manure, while others can be found on different economic plants, causing injury to plant directly by feeding, or by transmitting various disease agents (Zakhvatkin, 1941; Baker and Wharton, 1952; Scheucher, 1957; Hughes and Jackson, 1958; Hughes, 1961; Griffiths, 1977; OC'onnor, 1994; Kettle, 1995). On the other side, The Acaridida mites are a very important food source for many Mesostigmata species, as the latter reduce the number of the former in different environments (on manure or plants).

Knowledge concerning the Acaridides fauna in Egypt is extremely poor as compared with the other groups of mites, such as: Mesostigmata and Prostigmata. Many points concerning to this group are questionable. However, several taxa were found to be new and several morphological characteristics were described. Many species and few genera affiliated to the Acaridida mites were recorded in Upper Egypt by: Eraky (1993; 1994a,b; 1997; 1998; 1999a,b,c; 2000a,b); Eraky and Shoker (1993a,b; 1994); Abu El-Maged (1998); Negm (2007); Eraky and Osman (2008a,b); Eraky (2010); Abdelgayed et al. (2017); Eraky et al. (2017) [26-32].

The work herein concerned with the species composition of mite species inhabiting manure and dung hills in the newly established animal production farm of the Faculty of Agriculture, Sohag University. An annotated list of mite species surveyed from animal farms in Egyptian Governorates was provided for both the present work and previous studies of certain authors. [33-45]. Such information is needed to support future ecological works of mite fauna inhabiting animal farms.

Materials and Methods

Samples (10 replicates) were taken fortnightly from manure and dung hills of the experimental animal production farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Sohag University, during two years started from march, 2018. Each sample (500g) was preserved in plastic bags labeled with necessary information, then transferred to the laboratory for extraction by using the modified Berlese’s extractor apparatus. From the extracted arthropod fauna, mites were isolated in small vials, then cleared up in lactic acid (4 days) and mounted in Hayerʼs medium. The mounted slides were placed in an oven at 45-50 °C (7 days) till dryness. The identification of mite species was done using illustrated keys established by: Scheucher (1957); O’Connor (1982); Zaher (1984a,b; 1986); Evans (1992); O’Connor (2001); Eraky and Osman (2008a); Eraky (2010).

Results and Discussion

The mite fauna inhabiting animal farms in Egypt, currently include 120 species pertaining to 18 families and 53 genera of different mite groups. Most of the surveyed species were reported from the husbandry farms of animals by: Shoker and Eraky (1994); Abu El-Maged (1998); Negm (2007) (Assiut Governorate) and Abdel-Aziz (1999) (Sohag Governorate). The present study recorded only six species. Of these, two histostomatid (Histiostoma arcuatus Negm, 2007, Hormosianoetus mahunkai Eraky & Shoker, 1993); single siteroptid species (Siteroptes manure Soliman & Kandeel, 1986); two macrochelid species (Macrocheles solimani Hafez, El-Badry & Nasr, 1985; Macrocheles merdarius (Berlese, 1889) and one uropodid species (Uropodiaspis aegyptiacus Ahmed, 1984), from manure and dung hills of the experimental production farm of the Faculty of Agriculture, Sohag University. On the contrary, Abdel-Aziz (1999), recorded 35 species of mites (Tarsonemina, 3 species; Oribatei, 2 species; Acarididia, 16 species and Mesostigmata, 14 species), from three husbandries of animals at Sohag Governorate. WhileShoker and Eraky (1994), surveyed 28 species of the Mesostigmata belonging to 9 families and 18 genera extracted from animal farms, also Negm (2007) recorded 47 species of different groups of mites at Assiut Governorate (Table 1). This difference between the scarce number of mite species collected in the current study and the number of mite species recorded from other farms, may be due to the fact that, the farms of high numbers of mite species were established from more than 35 years ago and that made the species stable, in comparison to the farm of the present study, which did not exceed five years of construction. Through the present study, attention is required to reduce the number of mite pests, which may be transmitted to agricultural crops. Also, attention must be taken into consideration to the predatory mites, to study their efficiencies in reducing the numbers of the phytophagous ones on different crops [46,47].

Table 1.



  1. Abdel-Aziz SM (1999) Ecological and Taxonomical Studies on some Acaridia Mites in Upper Egypt. Fac Agric Univ pp.122.
  2. Abdelgayed AS (2017) Species composition of phytophagous and predatory mites associated with citrus orchards in Assiut Governorate. Fac Agric Univ pp. 155.
  3. Abdelgayed AS, Negm MW, Eraky SA, Helal TY, Moussa SFM (2017) Phytophagous and predatory mites inhabiting citrus trees in Assiut Governorate, Upper Egypt. Assiut J Agric Sci 48(1): 173-181.
  4. Abdel-Sater MA, Eraky SA (2002) Bulbs mycoflora and their relationship with three stored product mites. Mycopathologia 153: 33-39.
  5. Abdel-Sater MA, Hemida SK, Eraky SA, Nasser MAK (1995) Distribution of fungi on two mite species and their habitats in Egypt. Folia Microbiol 40(3): 304-313.
  6. Abu El-Maged TM (1998) Recent Trends for Controlling some Harmful Arthropods in the Husbandry. Univ of Assiut p. 97.
  7. Baker EW, Wharton GW (1952) An Introdution to Acarology. New York Macrhillan pp. 465.
  8. Eraky SA (1990) Taxonomy and ecology of some Acarida mites. Hungarian Academy of Science, Budapest Hungary pp. 113.
  9. Eraky SA (1993) Myianoetus lili spn (Acari: Anoetidae) educed from manure, Assiut, Upper Egypt. Folia ent hung 54: 47-49.
  10. Eraky SA (1994) Three new anoetid mites extracted from animal excrement and from garlic (Acarina: Anoetidae). Folia ent hung 55: 217-223.
  11. Eraky SA (1994) Two new hypopi of Histiostoma Kramer, 1876 (Acari: Astigmata) recovered from pomegranate and date fruits. Assiut J Agric Sci 25(2): 157-162.
  12. Eraky SA (1997) A key to new and old histiostomatid deutonymphs recorded in Assiut area with descriptions of two new species (Acari: Histiostomatidae). Assiut J Agric Sci 28(1): 99-116.
  13. Eraky SA (1998) Mahunkaglyphus solimani gen. and sp. n. and three new species (Acari: Astigmata) described from termite nests, western desert Egypt. Folia ent Hung 59: 241-250.
  14. Eraky SA (1999a) A new genus and three new species of mites (Acari: Acaridida) phoretic on termites infesting the camphor trees in Aswan, Egypt. Annals hist nat Mus natu Hung 91: 209-217.
  15. Eraky SA (1999b) Five new hypopial nymphs (Acari: Acaridae and Histiostomatidae) described from different habitats. Folia ent hung 60: 45-56.
  16. Eraky SA (1999c) Seven new species of mites (Acari: Acaridida) educed from different habitats in Upper Egypt. Assiut J Agric Sci 30(5): 65-80.
  17. Eraky SA (1999d) Four new species of genus Histiostoma Kramer, 1876 (Acari: Astigmata) subsistent in manure and dunghills. 8th Conf. of Pests & Dis. of Veg. & Fruits in Ismailia 1: 1491-60.
  18. Eraky SA (2000a) Identification key for some Acarididia mites (hypopi) (Acari: Astigmata) with descriptions of two new species. Assiut J Agric Sci 31: 341-371.
  19. Eraky SA (2000b) Morphological characters used in the taxonomy of the Acarididia mites. A Review Article Submitted to the Egyptian Scientific Committee for Promotion to Professorship p. 66.
  20. Eraky SA, Nasser MAK (1993) Seasonal abundance of some Acaridida species at an animal-farm Assiut J Agric Sci 24(2): 211-222.
  21. Eraky SA, Osman MA (2008a) Caloglyphus manuri sp n (Acaridida: Acaridae) extracted from chicken manure, Mansoura, Egypt. Acarines 2: 43-44.
  22. Eraky SA, Osman MA (2008b) Some biological aspects and life table parameters of Caloglyphus manuri Eraky & Osman (Acaridida: Acaridae) fed on different kinds of food. Acarines 2: 45-48.
  23. Eraky SA, Osman MA (2008c) New identification key for some Acaridides (Acaridida) from Upper Egypt, with description of a new Acaridae species. Acarines 2: 49-60.
  24. Eraky SA, Shoker NI (1993a) Mites extracted from uprooted banana sucker (Acari: Anoetidae). Folia ent hung 54: 51-56.
  25. Eraky SA, Shoker NI (1993b) Description of two new anoetid mites (Acari: Anoetidae) collected from different habitats. Assiut J Agric Sci 24(2): 233-241.
  26. Eraky SA, Shoker NI (1994) Two new deutonymphs of the genus Histiostoma Kramer, 1876 (Acari: Histiostomatidae) existing in stored onions. Assiut J Agric Sci 25(2): 163-168.
  27. Eraky SA, Shoker NI (1995) The description of two new anoetid mites (Acari: Anoetidae) deriving from different habitats. Folia entomologica Hungarica rovartani Közlemények 56: 21-26.
  28. Eraky SA, Rizk MMA, Abdel-Gawad KH, Abdel-Aziz SM (2000) Description of four new mite species (Acari: Astigmata) collected from manure of animals, Sohag, Upper Egypt. XV. National Biology Congress 5-9.
  29. Eraky SA, Abdel-Galil FA, Bohibah MK (2010) Identification key for some phoretic acaridids (Acari: Acaridida) from Upper Egypt with description of two new species. Assiut J Agric Sci 41(3): 76-92.
  30. Evans GO (1992) Principles of Acarology. CAB International, University Press pp. 563.
  31. Griffiths DA (1977) A new family of astigmatid mites from lies Crozet, Sub Antractia: Introducing a new concept relating to ontogenetic development of the idiosomal setae. Journal of Zoology (Lond) 182: 291-308.
  32. Houck MA, O C'onnor BM (1991) Ecological and evolutionary significance of phoresy in the Astigmata. Ann. Rev Entomol 36: 611-636.
  33. Hughes AM (1961) The mites of stored food. Tech Bull Minist Agric. London 9: 1-281.
  34. Hughes AM (1976) The mites of stored food and houses. Tech. Bull. Minist. Agric. Fisheries and Food 9: 1-379.
  35. Hughes RD, Jackson CG (1958) A review of the Anoetidae (Acari) Virginia J Sci 9: 1-198.
  36. Kettle DS (1995) Medical and veterinary entomology. (2nd), CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, pp. 725.
  37. Negm MW (2007) Taxonomy and Ecology of Some Acarid and Histiostomatid Mite Species in Assiut Govemorate. Fac of Agric, Assiut Univ Egypt pp.100.
  38. OC'onnor BM (1982) Evolutionary ecology of astigmatid mites. Annu Rev Entomol 27: 385-409.
  39. OC'onnor, BM (1991) A preliminary report on the arthropod associated Astigmatid mites (Acari: Acariformes) of the Huron Mountains of Huron Mountains of Northern Michigan, Academician 24: 307-320.
  40. OC'onnor BM (1994) Life history modifications in Astigmatid mites. Houck, Chapman, Hall (Edt.), New York, London 6: 136-159.
  41. OC'onnor BM (2001) Acaroid mites (Acari: Astigmata) associated with termites (Isoptera). University of Michigan.
  42. Scheucher R (1957) Systematik okologie der deutschen Anoetiden. In: Stammer HJ (Edt.), Beitrage Zur Systematik und Okologie Mittle europascher Acarina 1: 233-284.
  43. Shoker NI, Eraky SA (1994) Incidence of some predaceous mesostigmatid mite species at animal farm, Assiut, Upper Egypt. El-Minia Sci Bull 7(1): 57-65.
  44. Zaher MA (1984a) Survey and Ecological Studies on Phytophagous, Predaceous and Soil Mites in Egypt. 1. Phytophagous mites in Egypt (Nile Valley and Delta) PL 480 Programme USA Project No. EG_ARS_30 Grant No FG_EG_139. pp. 228.
  45. Zaher MA (1984b) Survey and Ecological Studies on Phytophagous, Predaceous and Soil Mites in Egypt. III Mites of Sinai PL. 480 Programme USA Project No EG_ARS_30 Grant No FG_EG_139 p. 36.
  46. Zaher MA (1986) Survey and Ecological Studies on Phytophagous, Predaceous and Soil Mites in Egypt. II-A: Predaceous & Nonphytophagous Mites (Nile Valley and Delta) Text. PL. 480 Programme USA Project No. EG_ARS_30, Grant No. FG_EG_139. Pp. 567.
  47. Zakhvatkin AA (1941) AIBS translation of: Fauna of USSR Arachnoidea 6(1).