Vincenzo Tosco, Riccardo Monterubbianesi, Scilla Sparabombe, Giulia Orilisi, Angelo Putignano and Giovanna Orsini*
Received: March 03, 2020; Published: July 13, 2020
Corresponding author: Giovanna Orsini, Polytechnic University of Marche, Department of Clinical Sciences and Stomatology (DISCO), Via Tronto 10, 60126, Ancona, Italy
This in vitro study aimed to qualitatively evaluate the effect of different remineralizing agents on the enamel pattern, after exposure to an acid solution. Fifteen human sound extracted third molars were collected and randomly allocated into the following five groups: Control Group (CG), without treatment; Negative Group (NG), treated with lactic acid solution; Mousse Group (MG), treated using a mousse of casein phosphopeptide (CPP) and amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP), associated with 0,33% sodium monofluorophosphate; Biosmalto Group (BG), treated with a dentifrice containing amorphous calcium phosphate functionalized with fluorine and carbonate-coated with citrate; Duraphat Group (DG), treated with a 5% sodium fluoride varnish. While CG remained immersed in chloramine solution for the entire period of the study, all the other groups were immersed in lactic acid for 2 hours and then subjected to the appropriate treatment for additional 2 hours, repeating the protocol 3 times a day, for 8 days. Finally, all samples were examined by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). SEM micrographs showed that CG had the typical morphological features of sound enamel, whereas NG presented superficial irregularities with early pattern of demineralization, characterized by apparent destruction of enamel prism cores. MG showed intact enamel prismatic arrangement and slight interprismatic dissolution, while BG and DG presented not defined margins of enamel prims and partial loss of interprismatic substance, being more pronounced in DG. Qualitative SEM evaluations demonstrate that topical applications of CPP+ACP associated with sodium monofluorophosphate could represent the most effective protocol for re-establishing the intact enamel structure, given acid environment.
Keywords: Dental caries; Dental enamel; CPP-ACP; Fluoride varnish; Sodium fluoride; Tooth demineralization; Tooth remineralization
Dental caries remains a fundamental concern of today’s practice
and continues to be one of the most common diseases in the world,
despite the significant progress of research and the diffused
home-practice of oral hygiene . The current concept of the
caries forming process is based on the accumulation of numerous
episodes of demineralization and remineralization, initiated by
acid-producing bacteria in the oral micro-environment [2,3]. The
demineralization of dental hard tissue still represents a growing
problem and appears to be the main responsible for dentinal
hypersensitivity and dental caries insurgence. Demineralization
occurs before cavitation when there is a loss of minerals from
hard dental tissues. Conversely, remineralization occurs when the
calcium and phosphate gradients invert and spread towards inside
of the lesion . Natural remineralization in the initial phase is
stimulated by saliva, which contains calcium ions, phosphate ions,
buffer agents, fluoride and other substances . However, when this
ideal condition is lacking, topical agents become essential to avoid
the demineralization. Nowadays, the topical fluoride plays a crucial
role for caries prevention and for remineralization of the dental
structure. The presence of fluoride ions in the oral cavity causes
the fluorapatite to precipitate the calcium and phosphate ions
existing in the saliva. The increase in pH will therefore lead to the
formation of larger crystals resistant to fluorine-containing acids
(fluorohydroxyapatite), developing a strong surface layer which
increases the resistance to demineralization . However, products
containing calcium, phosphate and fluoride in their bio-available forms have claimed to increase remineralization over products
containing only fluoride . Among these, the remineralizing
agent which has been extensively studied and accepted is casein
phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP). CPPACP
is a new agent for the prevention of dental caries . This milk
product facilitates remineralization, inhibits demineralization, and
prevents dental caries by forming a calcium phosphate reservoir
. Indeed, casein phosphate that occurs in CPP-ACP stabilizes
calcium and phosphate and facilitates the formation of calcium
phosphate nano-complexes on the tooth surface. These compounds
act as a source of minerals for the remineralization process.
Subsequently, amorphous calcium phosphate forms and localizes
on the tooth surface and acts as a source of calcium and phosphate
ions. This material could also quickly turn into hydroxyapatite
which is then deposited on the tooth surface [9,10]. Several studies
affirm that CPP-ACP is anticariogenic and capable of reversing the
early stages of enamel lesions in vitro and in clinical research .
Also, it is reported that CPP‐ACP and flour combination (ACFP)
create a synergic effect in caries prevention [11,12]. Therefore,
the literature confirms that demineralization can be countered or
reversed through different remineralization agents in non-cavitated
carious lesions, although there is confusion and inaccuracy of
their potential applications. Therefore, it is of great importance
to study new strategies and to know different agents to improve
the remineralization process. For this reason, the present in vitro
study aims to qualitatively evaluate, by means of scanning electron
microscopy (SEM), the effect of different remineralizing agents on
enamel morphology after exposure to an acid solution.
The following null hypotheses were tested:
a. The remineralizing agents do not influence the demineralized enamel surface after acid environment exposure and
b. There is not difference on the effect of the three remineralizing agents.
Fifteen sound third molars were extracted and collected for the present study. The exclusion criteria consisted of presence of lesions and decays, including white spots or hypomineralized lesions, fracture of either crown or root, developmental defects or any other crown deformities. After the surgical extraction, the soft tissue debris were cleaned using an ultrasonic scaler with distilled water. After that, the samples were cut horizontally using a diamond disk coupled to a handpiece, sectioning the crown from the root, and then stored in a 0,5% (w/w) chloramine solution (NH2Cl). Afterwards, the samples were randomly assigned into the following five groups (n=3): Control Group (CG), without treatment; Negative Group (NG), treated with demineralizing solution (pH=4.4); Mousse Group (MG), treated using GC Tooth Mousse (Recaldent, GC Europe) a mousse of casein phosphopeptide (CPP) and amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP), associated with 0,33% sodium monofluorophosphate; Biosmalto Group (BG), treated with Biosmalto (Curasept S.p.A., Italy), a mousse containing amorphous calcium phosphate functionalized with fluorine and carbonate-coated with citrate; Duraphat Group (DG), treated with Duraphat (Colgate-Palmolive), a 5% sodium fluoride varnish. While CG remained immersed in chloramine solution for the entire period of the study, changing the chloramine solution every 4 days, all the other groups were immersed in a demineralizing solution containing a 0.1M acid lactic, adjusted to pH 4.4, for 2 hours , and then subjected to the appropriate treatment for additional 2 hours, repeating the protocol 3 times a day, for 8 days. Finally, after treatment procedures, all samples were carefully cleaned, dehydrated and gold sputter-coated for evaluation using a SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope Zeiss Supra 40, Department of SIMAU, Polytechnic University of Marche, Italy), operated at 30kV and at a working distance of 12mm. Five pictures for each sample at different magnification were performed (4000x and 10000x).
Figure 1: Scanning electron microphotographs of a representative CG Group tooth sample at (A) 4.0K, and (B) 10.00K original magnification. In (A), the typical aspect of sound enamel morphology, with enamel-like crystal structure (black arrows) is showed. In (B), a homogeneous smoothed area between the interprismatic rods (black arrows) is highlighted.
Scanning electron micrographs, taken at different magnification
in the 5 groups, showed dissimilar morphological features of the
enamel surface, as follows.
CG displayed the characteristic sound enamel morphology with intact enamel rods and interrods (Figure 1), while NG presented an irregular surface with early pattern of demineralization, characterized by interprismatic tissue dissolution without apparent destruction of enamel prism cores but retained periphery (Figure 2). MG showed a prismatic disposition of the native enamel and a slight interprismatic dissolution. A newly-formed layer of needlelike crystals has been deposited on the surface of the demineralized enamel. These crystals seemed to be randomly arranged, parallel to the surface, reconstructing a structure which is like the intact enamel unit (Figure 3). BG showed an incomplete newly-formed layer of needle-like crystals. The disposition of these latter crystals was rather irregular, thus presenting a partial prisms dissolution which does slightly resemble the native enamel unit (Figure 4). Finally, the DG presented undefined margins of enamel prisms and partial loss of interpretismatic substance, displaying several areas of disorganized arrangement. Therefore, DG results show a partially demineralized surface with no evident signs of reorganization of the native structure of the sound enamel (Figure 5).
Figure 2: Scanning electron microphotographs of a representative NG Group tooth sample at (A) 4.0K, and (B) 10.00K original magnification. The typical aspect of enamel demineralization. After exposed to the acid lactic solution, the enamel morphology presents an early stage of prisms destruction, with slight interprismatic tissue dissolution occurred at the peripheral areas of the prisms. The margins of the prisms are not clearly identifiable.
Figure 3: Scanning electron microphotographs of a representative MG Group tooth sample at (A) 4.0K, and (B) 10.00K original magnification. The intact enamel prismatic arrangement and slight interprismatic dissolution. Presence of the ideal oriented and ordered mineralization pattern partially accomplished, with the formation of mineral crystals parallel on enamel surface.
The understanding of the imbalance between demineralization and remineralization process is the key factor for caries control and prevention [4,14]. Several studies confirm that an effective management of carious lesions is to early detect the initial demineralization and to use non-invasive techniques by means of various remineralizing agents . A lot of products present in the market, containing calcium, phosphate and fluoride in their bioavailable forms, have claimed to develop and increase the remineralization process. The objective of this in vitro study was to qualitatively evaluate the remineralization effect of three different agents on the enamel surface after exposure of acid environment: GC Tooth Mousse+sodium monofluorophosphate, Biosmalto mousse and Duraphat varnish. the results of this study rejected both of the null hypothesis that the remineralizing agents does not effect the demineralized enamel surface after acid environment exposure and there is not different between on the effect of three remineralizing agents. Since it is difficult to reproduce the demineralization phase in the oral environment in vitro, several studies have developed different demineralization methods using pH cycle and acid-etched models, to obtain an artificial enamel lesion [3,16-18]. This study, in agreement with the report of Bonetti et al., shows that an exposure under 0.1M acid lactic (pH 4.4) can reproduce the effects of the demineralization occurring on the enamel surface, thus simulating the initial step of a carious lesion . In fact, the scanning electron micrographs of NG demonstrate an early pattern of demineralization with evidence of interprismatic tissue loss. In particular, the demineralized enamel surface exhibited a loss of the enamel prism core, without preserving the periphery, leading to a disordered arrangement of the rod-like residual . Therefore, to oppose these effects, a lot of products present on the market, containing calcium, phosphate, synthetic hydroxyapatite and fluoride in their bioavailable forms, have been claimed to enhance the remineralization process [20- 22]. The null hypotheses of the present qualitative evaluation on the effects of the tested three commonly used remineralizing agents, on enamel surface, after exposure of acid environment, were both rejected. Indeed, MG, BG and DG do influence the superficial enamel demineralization and there is a difference among the effects exerted by the three products. MG (CPP-ACP associated with 0,33% of sodium monofluorophosphate) showed the most promising results. Indeed, SEM images of MG seem to reveal an attempt to recover tissues at the level of the superficial enamel layers, with a predominantly intact and regular interprismatic structure (Figure 3). Moreover, the electron scanning observations displayed the formation of oriented and ordered mineral crystals parallel to the enamel surface. Although ideal oriented and ordered mineralization pattern was accomplished partially, it is noteworthy that the creation of these mineral crystals parallel on enamel surface could be attributed to a secondary crystallization . This suggests an excellent remineralizing potential of the MG, also confirmed by several studies, affirming that, given acid environmental conditions, topical applications of CPP-ACP can be effective in increasing enamel remineralization [13,23]. Indeed, CPP-ACP complex, a milk protein derivative, has been proven to have anticariogenic effects [24-26]. Some studies report that its association with fluoride (CPPACPF) improves remineralization [6,27]. Numerous authors have shown that there was a consistent increase in remineralization and a decrease in carious lesion depth when combining the latter two [12,28,29]. Jayarajan et al.  presented that the added value of fluoride (NaF 0.2%) to CPP-ACP slightly showed more amount of remineralization than CPP-ACP alone. Therefore, the results analyzed in this study confirm the potential benefits of CPP-ACPF, as frequently highlighted by the scientific literature [17,20,24,28].
Figure 4: Scanning electron microphotographs of a representative BG Group tooth sample at (A) 4.0K, and (B) 10.00K original magnification. The honeycomb structure was at an early stage, with slight prism cores dissolution. The enamel-like crystal structure reminds a potential remineralizing of the substrate. The new crystal formed on the surface of the demineralized enamel is not evident.
Figure 5: Scanning electron microphotographs of a representative DG Group tooth sample at (A) 4.0K, and (B) 10.00K original magnification. The predominant irregular structure, with slight prism cores dissolution. The margins of the interprismatic structure of the enamel are not evident, presenting a surface disorganization (black arrows)..
Regarding BG group, it is possible to observe the presence of a partially interprismatic dissolution of the enamel surface. Several studies demonstrated that citrate ions play an important role in stabilizing the precursor ACP phase [30-32]. In addition, , showed that the use of fluoride and citrate modify specific ACP and ACPF physico-chemical properties, to generate potentially anti-caries agents and remineralizing effects . Furthermore, by adding citrate to these fluoride-doped ACP nanoparticles, it is possible to restore enamel in its natural structure . ACPFcitrate treated samples showed a faster remineralization effect compared to the ACP- treated ones, especially at the level of enamel prismatic structure, thus being suitable for patients exhibiting severe demineralization . Indeed, in partial disagreement with this latter beneficial effect report, our finding does not clearly demonstrate improved remineralization in BG (Figure 4). Although the newly deposited crystals are less ordered than the natural ones and rather incomplete, it is remarkable that they form a layer of enamel-like crystals, mimicking enamel substrate. In this sense, it would seem possible that the remineralizing action of ACPF combined with citrate is less pronounced than the one exhibited by CCP-ACP associated with 0,33% sodium monofluorophosphate of MG. Among the groups treated with the three remineralizing compounds, DG, in which a 5% sodium fluoride-based varnish was applied, seems to be the one with less evident remineralizing benefits on the superficial enamel, partially confirmed to what is reported by the existing scientific literature [34,35]. Although several studies have assessed the beneficial effects of fluoride varnishes on the remineralization process, Duraphat appears to be the least effective [36-38]. For instance, to prevent the incipient caries,  concluded that the varnish containing 5% sodium fluoride associated with CPP–ACP was shown to be more effective than the conventional one based on 5% sodium fluoride . In addition, these data are consistent with  that, analyzing three different varnishes, obtained an increase of enamel surface microhardness in samples treated with varnish containing 5% sodium fluoride associated with CPP-ACP . In disagreement with these latter reports and with our findings, some studies claimed that 5% sodium fluoride varnish represents the most effective agent for remineralization [39,40]. Therefore, due to the controversial scientific evidence, the clear and effective advantages of fluoride-based varnishes are still debated, and caution must be paid interpreting the results of the present studies. Scanning electron micrographs obtained by DG displayed a predominantly uneven surface. After the remineralization treatment, several areas of demineralized enamel are still evident, showing a loss of interprismatic substance and disorganized arrangement. Therefore, the attempt to form an ideally-oriented and ordered mineralization pattern on enamel surface has not occurred. The current study design was limited by the in vitro simulation of oral cavity conditions. Another limitation is that Scanning Electron Micrographs do not allow to clearly evaluate the real potential of these products, since only qualitative observations have been obtained. Further studies are needed to quantitively evaluate the changes after treatment, by determining the chemical composition of enamel structure and performing micro-hardness test.
Considering the limitations of this in vitro study, it can be concluded that, in the event of exposure to acid environmental conditions, topical applications of CPP+ACP associated with 0,33% of sodium monofluorophosphate may represent the most effective protocol for re-establishing the intact enamel structure.
This work was supported by funds of the Polytechnic University of Marche. The authors would like to thank Adriano Di Cristoforo, Department of Materials, Environmental Science and Urban Planning (SIMAU), CISMIN, Polytechnic University of Marche. He contributed to the setting of Scanning Electron Microscopy for enamel surface analysis. Also, would like to thank Maria Cristina Storaci for samples preparation.
The authors certify that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication and no financial relationships relevant to this article.
V. Tosco contributed to the acquisition and interpretation of data and manuscript discussion. R. Monterubbianesi and S. Sparabombe contributed to the study design and data interpretation. G. Orilisi performed the SEM analysis and contributed to data interpretation. A. Putignano and G. Orsini contributed to the research plan, data interpretation and supervised the entire project. All authors participated to the writing of the present manuscript.
Bio chemistryUniversity of Texas Medical Branch, USA
Department of Criminal JusticeLiberty University, USA
Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Kentucky, USA
Department of MedicineGally International Biomedical Research & Consulting LLC, USA
Department of Urbanisation and AgriculturalMontreal university, USA
Oral & Maxillofacial PathologyNew York University, USA
Gastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity of Alabama, UK
Department of MedicineUniversities of Bradford, UK
OncologyCirculogene Theranostics, England
Radiation ChemistryNational University of Mexico, USA
Analytical ChemistryWentworth Institute of Technology, USA
Minimally Invasive SurgeryMercer University school of Medicine, USA
Pediatric DentistryUniversity of Athens , Greece
The annual scholar awards from Lupine Publishers honor a selected number Read More...