To Evaluate Different Soft Tissue Liners, as Functional
Impression Materials, by Determining its Effect on
Surface Roughness of Dental Stone Over a Time
Period: An In-Vitro Study
Volume 3 - Issue 2
Swapnil B Shankargouda1*, Preena.Sidhu2 and Sounyala.N.Rayannavar3
-
Author Information
Open or Close
- 1Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Kle academy of Higher Education and Research’s VK institute of Dental Sciences, India
- 2MDS, Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Faculty of Dentistry, SEGi University, Kota Damansara, Malaysia
- 3MDS, Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge Reader, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research’s VK Institute of Dental Sciences, Belgaum,
India
*Corresponding author:
Swapnil B Shankargouda, Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Kle
Academy of Higher Education and Research’s VK institute of Dental Sciences, Nehru Nagar, JNMC Campus, India
Received: October 01, 2018; Published: October 09, 2018
DOI: 10.32474/MADOHC.2018.03.000159
Full Text
PDF
To view the Full Article Peer-reviewed Article PDF
Abstract
a) Purpose: To evaluate, compare and contrast the changes in surface roughness of dental stone casts, recovered from
commercially available chair-side soft liners, used as functional impression materials.
b) Methods: Ten disk-shaped denture soft liner samples [18 mm wide × 2 mm thick] were fabricated and dental stone poured
over it after zero hours [control], one day, seven days, fourteen days and twenty one days, with a total sample size of 100 obtained
from GC SOFT LINER [50 samples] and MOLLOSIL [50 samples] respectively.The dental stone samples were then evaluated for
mean surface roughness values [Ra] using a profilometer.
c) Results: Student’s paired t test [p<0.05] and Co-efficient of variance [C.V] test was used for statistical analysis. The mean
surface roughness values of MOLLOSIL samples increased gradually and consistently over the period of zero hours to twenty-one
days in comparison to the GC SOFT LINER samples.
d) Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, silicone-based soft tissue liner showed better results than the acrylic-based
soft liner in terms of surface roughness, over the period of zero hours to twenty-one days.
Abstract|
Introduction|
Materials and Methodology|
Results|
Discussion|
Conclusion|
References|