email   Email Us: info@lupinepublishers.com phone   Call Us: +1 (914) 407-6109   57 West 57th Street, 3rd floor, New York - NY 10019, USA

Lupine Publishers Group

Lupine Publishers

  Submit Manuscript

ISSN: 2637-4692

Modern Approaches in Dentistry and Oral Health Care

Research Article(ISSN: 2637-4692)

To Evaluate Different Soft Tissue Liners, as Functional Impression Materials, by Determining its Effect on Surface Roughness of Dental Stone Over a Time Period: An In-Vitro Study

Volume 3 - Issue 2

Swapnil B Shankargouda1*, Preena.Sidhu2 and Sounyala.N.Rayannavar3

  • Author Information Open or Close
    • 1Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Kle academy of Higher Education and Research’s VK institute of Dental Sciences, India
    • 2MDS, Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Faculty of Dentistry, SEGi University, Kota Damansara, Malaysia
    • 3MDS, Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge Reader, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research’s VK Institute of Dental Sciences, Belgaum, India

    *Corresponding author: Swapnil B Shankargouda, Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Kle Academy of Higher Education and Research’s VK institute of Dental Sciences, Nehru Nagar, JNMC Campus, India

Received: October 01, 2018;   Published: October 09, 2018

DOI: 10.32474/MADOHC.2018.03.000159

Full Text PDF

To view the Full Article   Peer-reviewed Article PDF

Abstract

a) Purpose: To evaluate, compare and contrast the changes in surface roughness of dental stone casts, recovered from commercially available chair-side soft liners, used as functional impression materials.

b) Methods: Ten disk-shaped denture soft liner samples [18 mm wide × 2 mm thick] were fabricated and dental stone poured over it after zero hours [control], one day, seven days, fourteen days and twenty one days, with a total sample size of 100 obtained from GC SOFT LINER [50 samples] and MOLLOSIL [50 samples] respectively.The dental stone samples were then evaluated for mean surface roughness values [Ra] using a profilometer.

c) Results: Student’s paired t test [p<0.05] and Co-efficient of variance [C.V] test was used for statistical analysis. The mean surface roughness values of MOLLOSIL samples increased gradually and consistently over the period of zero hours to twenty-one days in comparison to the GC SOFT LINER samples.

d) Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, silicone-based soft tissue liner showed better results than the acrylic-based soft liner in terms of surface roughness, over the period of zero hours to twenty-one days.

Abstract| Introduction| Materials and Methodology| Results| Discussion| Conclusion| References|

https://www.high-endrolex.com/21