Combined on-Farm Analysis of Management Procedures and Vaccination Protocols: The Way to Maximize the Health of the Herd Volume 3 - Issue 1

Ramon Armengol¹* and Marta Bassols¹

• ¹Department of Animal Science, University of Lleida, Spain

Received: October 29, 2019;   Published: November 26, 2019

Corresponding author: Ramon Armengol, Department of Animal Science, University of Lleida, Spain

DOI: 10.32474/CDVS.2019.03.000155

Abstract PDF

Abstract

During a farm animal’s life, there are a lot of situations that carry stress and induce immunosuppression, increasing the risk of infections and diseases. At the same time, veterinarians and farmers make a big effort (technical and economical) to increase immunity, setting complete vaccination programs. Frequently, this prevention through vaccination fails because administration is carried out during immunosuppression periods. We propose an easy, accurate and understandable strategy based on a complete visit of the farm and interview with the farmer. It is purposed to analyze altogether management procedures on farm, other phenomena and vaccination protocols that occur during the ruminant’s life. After a deep analysis, we suggest changes in the farm’s routine in order to maximize health status of the ruminants, reducing stress and immunosuppression periods, increasing efficacy of vaccines and efficiency of the production system. This strategy includes the analysis of the ruminants’ life, day by day, through a spreadsheet.

Keywords: Advice; cattle; management; ruminants; stress

Introduction

Increase or maximize the health of the ruminants in a herd should be a priority for both farmers and veterinarians. Since long, the use of vaccines in order to directly increase immunity but also reduce amount of pathogens in the herd and reduction of clinical signs in infected animals has been carried out [1-3]. It is also well known that stress factors have a negative impact on the immune system and ruminants submitted to it might suffer from stress-induced immunosuppression during several days [4]. Farm animals are submitted to management, physiological status and environment that can induce stress [4,5]. Even when this management is carried out properly and welfare is excellent in the farm, ruminants can be under 30 immunosuppression for a period of time that ranges from hours to weeks [4,6,7].
This stress may, directly or indirectly, induce a decrease of vaccination efficacy, above all when administration of the vaccine is done during this period of immunosuppression. Ideally, ruminants should not be vaccinated during these immunosuppression periods. On the day by day of a farm, this golden rule is often forgotten, and vaccinations are done under stress or immunosuppression periods. Veterinarians tend to assume that vaccination protocols and management strategies they advise for are correctly done. The reality is that on farm routine brings to a bias in between what is set and what is done. The main objective of this manuscript is to provide a strategy for veterinarians, farmers and advisors in order to identify stress periods and vaccine administrations, evaluate if an increase of health and efficiency can be achieved.

Material and Methods

For this strategy a spreadsheet with several columns and multiple lines (Figure 1) is needed and an interview with the farmer/herd manager that will last 1 to 2 hours will be agreed. It is recommended to have agreed an appointment time before, it is crucial not to be in a hurry and start and finish the interview at once. It is also recommended to have this appointment visiting the farm and the animals, as if it was the first time you are in that farm.
Data collected will be all the stressing management, practices or statuses that occur in a farm from day 0 of life until completing first lactation, including dry off and the second parturition. Most common stress factors must be detailed, and the immunosuppression period attributed. It is also essential to detail all the different feeding and allocation that ruminants will have during the period under study. Finally, all the vaccination protocols will be detailed (product and day of administration -age or day after parturition-). All this data will be in columns and placed in the spreadsheet cell corresponding to the day that is done (Figure 2).

Results and Discussion

The result of this appointment and post office work will be a spreadsheet full of different information that includes nutrition, management, immunosuppression, vaccination and disease. This way to gather information, will allow the advisor to detect, very quickly, unwanted phenomena in a farm, which reduce the health status of the animals. It will be easy to detect failures in the application of vaccinations under periods of stress or immunosuppression, different management too close together in time or too many stressing changes at once (i.e. grouping and change of feeding the same day).
Furthermore, it allows the consultant to suggest changes in the tempos of conducting management practices or suggest changes in the days of vaccination so that they do not coincide with periods of stress and immunosuppression. Thus, maximizing the potential of vaccinations, not only in their ability to generate immunity, but also just when it is desired to generate immunity. As examples, vaccination for respiratory pathogens is strongly recommended at least 2 weeks before transport or grouping and vaccination for BVDV is strongly recommended 3 to 4 weeks before insemination/ matting in order to avoid abortion or persistently infected bovines. Surprisingly, the advisor can sometimes suggest changes that will be better for health status but also for the production costs of the farmer. As an example, reduction on feeding milk replacer to calves without any impact on performance (Figures 3 & 4).

Blue oval shows the stress factors in orange (late dehorning, sudden weaning and grouping) in 15 days and the immunosuppression caused, having a negative impact on the booster of respiratory disease vaccination (in red). Red oval shows the consequence: endemic respiratory disease in this group of animals. PCS: number of calves. BRSV: Bovine respiratory syncytial virus. PI-3: Bovine parainfluenza type 3 virus. BVDV: Bovine viral diarrhoea. IBR: Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis. BRD: Bovine respiratory disease.
Changes on management procedures, timing on management and vaccination protocol reduced respiratory disease after grouping. Decisions taken were: Dehorning at 15 days of age, gradual weaning and vaccination protocol started a week earlier. Results were a spare of milk and a 60% decrease of BRD cases. PCS: number of calves. BRSV: Bovine respiratory syncytial virus. PI-3: Bovine parainfluenza type 3 virus. BVDV: Bovine viral diarrhoea. IBR: Infectious Bovine Rhinotracheitis. BRD: Bovine respiratory disease. ML: Milk

Conclusion

Continuous and detailed review of management procedures together with stress factors and vaccination protocols in ruminants’ farms is needed to maximize health status. This audit must be individualized. Results and changes set must be written, analyzed and described in an easy, accurate and understandable way for the farmer.

References

1. Lacasta D, Ferrer LM, Ramos JJ, González JM, Ortín A, et al. (2015) Vaccination schedules in small ruminant farms. Veterinary Microbiology 181(1-2): 34-46.
2. Stokka G, Goldsmith T J (2015) Feedlot Vaccination: Does It Really Matter? Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 31(2):185-196.
3. Noorduhuizen JP (2015) Role of vaccination in dairy herd health and productivity.Veterinary Record 177(18): 463.
4. Collier RJ, Renquist BJ, XiaoY (2017) A100-Year Review: Stress physiology including heat stress. Journal of Dairy Science 100(12):10367-10380.
5. Chebel RC,Silva PRB, Endres MI, Ballou MA, Luchterhand KL (2016) Social stressors and their effects on immunity and health of periparturient dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 99(4):3217-3228.
6. Caroprese M, Albenzio M,Marzano A, Schena L, Annicchiarico G, et al. (2010) Relationship between cortisol response to stress and behavior, immune profile, and production performance of dairy ewes. Journal of Dairy Science 93(6): 2395-2403.
7. Hulbert LE, Sonia JM (2016) Stress, immunity, and the management of calves. J Dairy Sci 99(4):3199-3216.