Evaluation of Knee Kinematics in Single Radius versus
Multi-Radii Total Knee Arthroplasty in India Population
: A Randomized Control Trial
Volume 1 - Issue 3
Lalit Maini1, Ankur Sharma*1, Anshul Goel2, Amit Sharma1, Surabhi Rohilla1, Sunil Jha3, Ashish Indani4 and Srinivas
Reddy Boreddy4
-
Author Information
Open or Close
- 1Department of Orthopaedics, LokNayak Hospital, India
- 2Department of Orthopedics, Wrightington Hospital, UK
- 3Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, India
- 4Medical Writing Domain, TATA Consultancy Services, India
*Corresponding author:
Ankur Sharma, LokNayak Hospital, orthopaedics, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi, IN 110006
Received: February 20, 2018; Published: February 28, 2018
DOI: 10.32474/OAJBEB.2018.01.000112
Full Text
PDF
To view the Full Article Peer-reviewed Article PDF
Abstract
Purpose: Single radius (SR) TKA implant designs are theoretically claimed to overcome “mid-flexion instability” and decrease
quadriceps loading encountered in multiple radii (MR) designs. However, limited/no data is available to support SR over MR designs
especially in Indian population.
Methods: The present study is a randomized controlled trial, comparing SR (n=17) and MR (n=13) knee kinematics based
on clinical scores (Knee Society Score; KSS), radiological (Lotke score), fluoroscopic, and electro-goniometric data in patients.
Fluoroscopic evaluation was done by contour based (2D/3D) registration technique.
Results: Patients demographics, KSS, radiological and electro-goniometric data were comparable between SR and MR TKA
groups. Anatomically, axial rotation and condylar lift-off data showed insignificant differences. However, MR TKA knees showed
higher (P < 0.05) antero-posterior translation compared to SR TKA knees. Similarly, electro-goniometry data has shown no statistical
significant difference between both the groups in terms of unloaded flexion-extension, internal-external rotations, walking, and sitto-
stand flexion/rotation.
Conclusion: The study showed no statistical significant difference between the two knee implant designs based on clinical,
radiological and goniometric data except antero-posterior translation. Mid-flexion instability was not seen with MR TKA which was
projected as the major problem with these designs.
Keywords: Electrogoniometry; Fluoroscopy; Knee Society Score; TKA; 2D over 3D registration.
Abstract|
Introduction|
Material and Methods|
Results|
Discussion|
Conclusion|
References|