Regulatory Inflation in Pharmaceutical Drug
Development?
Volume 1 - Issue 2
François-Xavier Lacasse*
-
Author Information
Open or Close
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, Canada
*Corresponding author:
François Xavier Lacasse, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, Canada
Received: April 06, 2018; Published: April 13, 2018
DOI: 10.32474/DDIPIJ.2018.01.000110
Full Text
PDF
To view the Full Article Peer-reviewed Article PDF
Abstract
During the last decade, and exponentially over the last three
years, numerous pharmaceutical manufacturing plants have closed
their doors following current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP)
audits from various agencies, such as FDA, EMA and Health Canada.
Regulatory affairs have been evolving and so should be the audits,
auditors and regulations. However, the density and interpretations
of regulatory requirements have become increasingly stringent,
especially with respect to sterile products, making them more
difficult to develop and manufacture within reasonable time and
cost. A quick search on Google shows numerous press releases
from various pharmaceutical organizations reporting critical/
major deficiencies, leading to temporary or permanent closures
of manufacturing plants. Furthermore, it seems that this evolving
situation has not only impacted drug shortage, but these events
have placed the pharmaceutical industry under a permanent state
of siege. The negative impacts of regulatory inflation are a center of
attention among pharmaceutical professionals.
Opinion|
Regulatory Narrative Leading to Global Inadequacy
of the Canadian Industry|
Regulatory Inflation: The Emergence and Growth
of the Compliance Industry|
Generational Turnover of Inspectors and Auditors|
Conclusion|