Transfusion Practice in Surgical Resuscitation
Department of a University Hospital, Antananarivo
(Madagascar)
Volume 3 - Issue 4
Rakotonomenjanahary Sidonie1*, Razafindrainibe Tanjonirina2, Rahanitriniaina Nadia Marie Philibertine3,
Randriamandrato Tantely Anjarahaingo Voahangiarivola3 and Rajaonera Tovohery Andriambelo3
-
Author Information
Open or Close
- 1Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit of the Joseph Dieudonné Rakotovao University Hospital Centre (CHUJDR), Madagascar
- 2Departments of Intensive Care Unit of Gynaecological and Obstetrics University Hospital Befelatanana (CHUGOB), Madagascar
- 3Department of Intensive Care Unit of the Joseph Ravoahangy Andrianavalona University, Madagascar
*Corresponding author:
Rakotonomenjanahary Sidonie, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit of the Joseph Dieudonné
Rakotovao University Hospital Centre (CHUJDR), Madagascar
Received: October 15, 2019 Published: October 23, 2019
DOI: 10.32474/SCSOAJ.2019.03.000166
Full Text
PDF
To view the Full Article Peer-reviewed Article PDF
Abstract
Introduction: Given the frequency of blood transfusion in the intensive care unit, it must be performed according to
the recommendations to ensure transfusion safety. The aim of our study is to describe the practice of transfusion in a surgical
resuscitation service.
Methods: This is a 21-month retrospective and descriptive study (January 2015 - September 2016) in the Department of
Surgical Resuscitation of the University Hospital JRA Antananarivo Madagascar. All patients over 15 years old and transfused during
the study period are included.
Results: 937 patients were transfused, with a transfusion rate of 25.3%. A male predominance (sex ratio = 2.21) was found with
an average age of 45.93 (± 17.74) years. Digestive haemorrhage and postoperative cases are common reasons for transfusion. The
blood count and the haemostasis assessment were performed in 58.38% and 50.48% of pre-transfusion patients, respectively. The
red blood cell (RBC) is the most used (54.72%), followed by Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) (28.68%) and then there have been cases of
use of Platelet – Rich Plasma (PRP) (12.93%) and Whole Blood (2.67%). The transfusion event occurred only in 0.43% of patients.
Conclusion: The realities of the country explain the insufficiency of biological arguments for transfusion. And the absence of a
well-defined haemovigilance system makes transfusion accidents unrecognized and undeclared. Hence the interest of a transfusion
protocol adapted to the Malagasy context.
Abstract|
Introduction|
Methods|
Results|
Discussion|
Conclusion|
References|