Email Us: info@lupinepublishers.com
Call Us: +1 (914) 407-6109
57 West 57th Street, 3rd floor, New York - NY 10019, USA
Lupine Publishers Group
Lupine Publishers
ISSN: 2643-6760
Mini Review(ISSN: 2643-6760) 
Fluid Resuscitation in Shock: Why Starling’s Law Is Wrong?
Volume 2 - Issue 5Ahmed N Ghanem*
-
Author Information
Open or Close
Ahmed N Ghanem, Consultant Urological Surgeon, Mansoura, Egypt
Received:May 25, 2019; Published: June 06, 2019;
DOI: 10.32474/SCSOAJ.2019.02.000149
Full Text
PDFAbstract
Professor Fifner’s article on “saline versus albumin fluid evaluation (SAFE) 2006 [1], concluding: “saline or albumin produces similar outcome”. In 1998 meta-analysis, albumin fared worse [2], justifying BMJ slogan “Why albumin may not work”. This is conflicting and perplexing. Professor Vincent
-
Mark E Smith
Bio chemistry
University of Texas Medical Branch, USA -
Lawrence A Presley
Department of Criminal Justice
Liberty University, USA -
Thomas W Miller
Department of Psychiatry
University of Kentucky, USA -
Gjumrakch Aliev
Department of Medicine
Gally International Biomedical Research & Consulting LLC, USA -
Christopher Bryant
Department of Urbanisation and Agricultural
Montreal university, USA -
Robert William Frare
Oral & Maxillofacial Pathology
New York University, USA -
Rudolph Modesto Navari
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
University of Alabama, UK -
Andrew Hague
Department of Medicine
Universities of Bradford, UK -
George Gregory Buttigieg
Maltese College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Europe -
Chen-Hsiung Yeh
Oncology
Circulogene Theranostics, England -
.png)
Emilio Bucio-Carrillo
Radiation Chemistry
National University of Mexico, USA -
.jpg)
Casey J Grenier
Analytical Chemistry
Wentworth Institute of Technology, USA -
Hany Atalah
Minimally Invasive Surgery
Mercer University school of Medicine, USA -
Abu-Hussein Muhamad
Pediatric Dentistry
University of Athens , Greece
