Evaluation of Two Interconnected Concepts in Sexuality
Volume 4 - Issue 1
Saeed Shoja Shafti*
-
Author Information
Open or Close
- Full Professor of Psychiatry, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences (USWR)Razi Psychiatric Hospital Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding author:
Saeed Shoja Shafti, Full Professor of Psychiatry, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences
(USWR)Razi Psychiatric Hospital Tehran, Iran
Received: May 26, 2020; Published: June 05, 2020
DOI: 10.32474/SJPBS.2020.04.000180
Full Text
PDF
To view the Full Article Peer-reviewed Article PDF
Abstract
During counseling or psychotherapeutic sessions, there are a lot of persons that introduce their partner as their absolute
sweetheart and companion, while criticize them, as well, regarding their incompetence with respect to gratification or provision of
anticipated sexual or romantic desires. Many of them may describe their partner as asexual, hypoactive or dishonest, while their
own displeasure or jealousness may have root in a mismatch between sensual yearnings and spiritual longings. Now a question may
arise that whether sex-object is equal to love-object, or they are unalike things with different intentions and tasks. Developmentally,
while the sex-object may or may not be at the same time a love-object, the love-object cannot be anything except than an ultimate
item derived from sex-drive, though in a more sublimated shape. If we see sex-object and love-object as unalike items with diverse
goal lines, such a distinction may assist patients toward achievement of better insight with respect to their judgments, object-related
conflicts and ambivalences, which possibly will guide their expectations towards more realistic objectives and less bewilderment
as regards their constant displeasures.
Keywords: Object; Sex-object; Love-object; Sexuality
Abstract|
Introduction|
Background|
Discussion|
Conclusion|
References|