Comparation Of Two Immunomagnetic Nanobeads In
PIG-A Gene Mutation Assay In Vitro
Volume 5 - Issue 5
Yi Zhang, Jiaqi Lv, Xiao Chen, Yulu Li, Haitao Yang, Qing Miao, Baolier Wuhan, Jingwei Xiao* and Binli*
- National Institute of Occupational Health and Poison Control, CHINA CDC
Received:September 06, 2021; Published:September 21, 2021
Corresponding author: Jingwei Xiao, Binli, National Institute of Occupational Health and Poison Control, CHINA CDC
DOI: 10.32474/SJPBS.2021.05.000223
Fulltext
PDF
To view the Full Article Peer-reviewed Article PDF
Abstract
Objective: The enrichment ability was compared between two kinds of immunomagnetic nanobeads in phosphatidylinositol
glycans A (PIG-A) gene mutation assay.
Methods: Glycosylphosphatidylinositol(GPI)(+) TK6 cells was enriched and GPI (-) TK6 cells were removed by both PE and
Biotin immunomagnetic nanobeads. Flow cytometry was used to detect the purification effect. PIG-A gene mutation assay was
performed on purified TK6cells with typical positive Ethyl methane Sulfonate (EMS).
Results: After once purification, PE immunomagnetic nanobeads could reduce the GPI(-)background value from 44.90±1.63%
to 0.27±0.12%, while the value of Biotin immunomagnetic nanobeads was 4.27±0.76%.Compared with the control group ,the
mutation frequency of PIG-A gene increased significantly at 50μg/mL on the 12th day, at 100μg/mL and 200μg/mL on the 4th, 8th
and 12th day.
Conclusions: PE immunomagnetic nanobeadswere more suitable than Biotin immunomagnetic nanobeads for TK6 cells
purification of PIG-A gene mutation assay in vitro.
Keywords: PE Immunomagnetic Nanobeads; Biotin Immunomagnetic Nanobeads; PIG-A Gene Mutation; EM; Flow Cytometry
Abbreviations: EMS:Ethylmethane Sulfonate; PIG-A: phosphatidylinositol glycans A; GPI:glycosylphosphatidylinositol;
FBS:Fetal Bovine Serum; PBS:Phosphate Buffer Solution.
Abstract|
Introduction|
Materials and Methods|
Ems Treatment|
Flow Cytometry Analysis|
Statistical Analysis|
Results|
Discussion|
Acknowledgement|
Disclosure of Interest|
References|