email   Email Us: info@lupinepublishers.com phone   Call Us: +1 (914) 407-6109   57 West 57th Street, 3rd floor, New York - NY 10019, USA

Lupine Publishers Group

Lupine Publishers

  Submit Manuscript

ISSN: 2641-1709

Scholarly Journal of Otolaryngology

Mini Review(ISSN: 2641-1709)

Functional and Structural Cortical Differences in Persons with Stuttering: A review on Underlying Mechanisms in the Literature in Last Decade Volume 9 - Issue 3

Berkay Arslan*

  • Department of Audiology, Atilim University, Turkey

Received: November 08, 2022;   Published: November 18, 2022

Corresponding author: Berkay Arslan, Department of Audiology, Atilim University, Turkey

DOI: 10.32474/SJO.2022.09.000312

Abstract PDF

Introduction

Stuttering is known as the disorder of speech fluency. It is characterized by the oral and laryngeal blocks, repetition of words, syllables or sounds or prolongation of sounds [1]. According to the definition by Legislative Council of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association [2], stuttering is a speech disorder that includes repetition of word or syllables partially or wholly, prolongation of sounds and silent blocks. Avoidance and/or escaping behaviors may also be observed in persons with stuttering (PWS), [3]. Theorical studies in the past about stuttering mainly focused on physcological side/symptoms of the disorder. According to former vision, stuttering was a speech disorder caused or triggered by the anxiety of an individual.

Brain Imaging Studies on Stuttering

Invention and use of brain imaging technologies led researchers to work more profoundly on the underlying mechanism of stuttering . In the current studies with the use of brain imaging technologies like MRI, MEG or FMRI, researchers found out some structural and functional differences in the cortical network of PWS compared to non-stutters. The current theoretical approach on stuttering has focused on motor control anatomy of speech and dysfunctions of definite areas (will be mentioned down) in PWS. General neuropsychological view on the disorder may be summed up in two categories:

a) Studies that focus on structural changes/ differences in the brain of PWS

b) Studies that focus on functional changes/ differences in the brain of PWS, [4].

Initially, potential regions / units that are responsible for | stuttering are reported as cortico - basal ganglia - thalamocortical circuits, inferior frontal gyrus (Broca’s area), and superior temporal gyrus [5]. These regions are thought to be responsible for selection of articulatory motor movements [6]. As the speech is considered as a flawless and effortless production of head, laryngeal and thorasic muscles in coordination, most of the studies focused on the motor execution problems in stuttering [7]. The most important cortical structure for motor preparation is the premotor cortex (PMC) with a distinct role of its ventral part (vPMC) for speech [8]. Adjacent to and partly overlapping with vPMC is the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) which includes in the left hemisphere, the well-known Broca’s area (Brodmann area 44, 45). Several studies on stuttering reported both anatomical and functional disturbances in this region. Activation differences – both hyper and hypo- were observed unilaterally and bilaterally in silent reading and speech production tasks [9]. The most recurrent finding is an anomalous right laterality in activity of the frontal operculum, the homologue of Broca’s area [10]. Three magneto- encephalography (MEG) studies revealed some interesting findings as well. Walla et al. [11] observed in adults who stutter (AWS) a decreased preparatory activity in or close to bilateral motor cortex preceding overt word reading. Sowman et al. [12] showed large differences in inferior frontal areas between fluent and stuttered speech. In this case report, blocks, as compared to fluent utterances, were associated with decreased activation in left and increased activation in right IFG extending into orbitofrontal areas. Finally, Salmelin et al. [13] found an advanced activation of the left motor cortex and a delayed activation of left IFG during overt reading. AWS suggested initiating motor programmes before preparing the articulatory code. This timing deficit has been linked with decreased white matter density in tracts connecting Broca’s area and left motor cortex [14,15]. Another view is also focused on the white and grey matter integrity in PWS. The most observed finding in the studies is the decrease of white matter volume in the regions of left arcuate/superior longitudunal fasciculus [14-17]. The goal of this mini review is to investigate the original studies on neural etiology of stuttering in tha last ten years.

Method

Research was carried on PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar in English and Turkish. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) keywords were chosen as “stuttering”, “basal ganglia”, “inferior frontal gyrus”, “fluency disorders” and for a general search “neural mechanism of stuttering”, “structural differences in stuttering”, “functional cortical differences in stuttering ”were chosen to search the databases. This review included the free full text papers, abstracts and conference presentation texts published in the last decade (between 2013 – 2022). Gender differences and genetic factors were not taken into consideration. Research that included children was excluded from the study as the maturation process of child brain might not finish yet.

Results

Table 1 sums up the literature of original research including free texts on neural mechanism of stuttering between 2013 and 2022. 39 papers were included in the first search, but 22 of them were excluded as participants were younger than 18. As “19 – 44 adult” and “Adult: 19+” filters were applied. Then existing 17 papers were scanned and books and documents, reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analysis papers were excluded. To sum up original studies, researchers found significant differences especially in the right hemisphere activation between PWS and non-stutter adult group. The primary finding of all studies was a deficit in the motor control and coordination in PWS group. Ventral precentral gyrus extends to the motor movement of tongue; and a difference in this region was observed in two different studies. One study focuses on the iron concentration as the highest concentration of iron is in the basal ganglia.

Discussion and Conclusion

Since the very beginning of the stuttering and brain imaging/ maping studies, theoritical view has maşnly focused on motor control anatomy of speech and dysfunctions of mentioned areas in PWS. Potential regions / units that are responsible of stuttering are cortico - basal ganglia - thalamocortical circuits, inferior frontal gyrus (Broca’s area), and superior temporal gyrus [5]. Especially IFG is very important as it plays an essential role for speech planning. Decreased volumes and integration of grey and white matter integrity in these regions were commonly observed in PWS [18,19]. These regions are also thought to be responsible for selection of articulatory motor movements [6].

Based on results of the published papers in the last decade, it was seen that significant activation differences were observed especially in the right hemisphere. Earlier studies in the field also focused on the lateralization problems and blaimed the hemispheric inconsistency for the disorders on the speech flow [20-22]. Overactivation in the motor areas of the right hemisphere was observed in PWS during speech production tasks [23-25]. EEG studies also showed that connections between cortical waves were significantly different in PWS. However as EEG is the measurement of the post synaptic potentials of the activation in the brain, results should be confirmed by the use of other topographic measurements [26].

The nature of the stuttering is both sensorial and motor. Although for many years it had been interpreted as a lack of motor control, studies revealed the fact that auditory integration of speech was also impacted in the PWS. Modern speech production theories explained two pathways about language processing: The Dorsal and the ventral streams. The dorsal stream is thought to be playing a major role in connecting the auditory – motor areas for the speech production and this area is also claimed to dysfunction in PWS, [7]. Furthermore, more studies are needed to comprehend the neural structure of stuttering. Relationship of the significant differences in the cortical regions and stuttering may be a reason or the result of the progression [27-29]. Longitudinal studies and outcomes of the therapies should also be taken into care to reveal the stuttering mechanism.

References

  1. Vanhoutte S, Cosyns M, van Mierlo P, Batens K, Corthals P, et al. (2016) When will a stuttering moment occur? The determining role of speech motor preparation. Neuropsychologia 86: 93-102.
  2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (1993) Definitions of communication disorders and variations. 35(3 Suppl): 40-41.
  3. Hicks PL (2007) Opportunities in Speech-Language Pathology Careers. New York, McGraw-Hill, USA.
  4. Ward D (2006) Stuttering and cluttering: Frameworks for understanding and treatment. Psychology Press, USA.
  5. GD BHS, Gajbe U, Singh BR, Sawal A, et al. (2022) The Role of Basal Ganglia and Its Neuronal Connections in the Development of Stuttering: A Review Article. Cureus 14(8): e28653.
  6. Masapollo M, Segawa JA, Beal DS, Tourville JA, Nieto Castañón A, et al. (2020) Behavioral and neural correlates of speech motor sequence learning in stuttering and neurotypical speakers: an fMRI investigation. Neurobiology of Language. Advance publication 2(1): 106-137.
  7. Chang SE, Garnett EO, Etchell A, Chow HM (2019) Functional and Neuroanatomical Bases of Developmental Stuttering: Current Insights. The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry 25(6): 566-582.
  8. Golfinopoulus E, Tourville J, Guenther F (2010) The integration of large-scale neural network modeling and functional brain imaging in speech motor control. NeuroImage 52(3): 862-874.
  9. Vanhoutte S (2015) Neurophysiological aspects of speech perception and production in stuttering, unpublished Ph.D thesis, Universiteit Gent, Belgium.
  10. Neef NE, Anwander A, Bütfering C, Schmidt-Samoa C, Friederici AD, et al. (2018) Structural connectivity of right frontal hyperactive areas scales with stuttering severity. Brain 141(1): 191-204.
  11. Walla Peter, Mayer Dagmar, Deecke Lüder, Thurner Stefan (2004) The lack of focused anticipation of verbal information in stutterers: A magnetoencephalographic study. Neuro Image 22: 1321-1327.
  12. Sowman PF, Crain S, Harrison E, Johnson BW (2012) Reduced activation of left orbitofrontal cortex precedes blocked vocalization: a magnetoencephalographic study. Journal of fluency disorders 37(4): 359-365.
  13. Salmelin R, Schnitzler A, Schmitz F, Freund HJ (2000) Single word reading in developmental stutterers and fluent speakers. Brain : a journal of neurology 123(Pt 6): 1184-1202.
  14. Sommer M, Koch MA, Paulus W, Weiller C, Büchel C (2002) Disconnection of speech-relevant brain areas in persistent developmental stuttering. Lancet 360: 380-383.
  15. Chang SE, Horwitz B, Ostuni J, Reynolds R, Ludlow CL (2011) Evidence of left inferior frontal-premotor structural and functional connectivity deficits in adults who stutter. Cereb Cortex 21: 2507-2518.
  16. Watkins Kate, Smith Stephen, Davis Steve, Howell Peter (2008) Structural and functional abnormalities of the motor system in develomental stuttering. Brain : a journal of neurology 131. 50-59.
  17. Cykowski MD, Fox PT, Ingham RJ, Ingham JC, Robin DA. (2010) A study of the reproducibility and etiology of diffusion anisotropy differences in developmental stuttering: a potential role for impaired myelination. Neuroimage 52: 1495-1504.
  18. Connally EL, Ward D, Howell P, Watkins KE (2013) Disrupted white matter in language and motor tracts in developmental stuttering. Brain and Language 131: 25-35.
  19. Chang SE, Zhu DC, Choo AL, Angstadt M (2015) White matter neuroanatomical differences in young children who stutter. Brain 138(Pt 3): 694-711.
  20. Szelag Elżbieta, Garwarska Kolek D, Herman A, Stasiek J (1993) Brain lateralization and severity of stuttering in children. Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis 53. 263-267.
  21. Sato Y, Mori K, Koizumi T, Minagawa Kawai Y, Tanaka A, et al. (2011) Functional lateralization of speech processing in adults and children who stutter. Frontiers in psychology 2: 70.
  22. Kushner HI (2012) Retraining left-handers and the aetiology of stuttering: The rise and fall of an intriguing theory. Laterality 17(6): 673-693.
  23. Fox PT, Ingham RJ, Ingham JC, Hirsch TB, Downs JH, et al. (1996) A PET study of the neural systems of stuttering. Nature 382: 158-161.
  24. Wu JC, Maguire G, Riley G, Fallon J, LaCasse L, et al. (1995) A positron emission tomography [18F] deoxyglucose study of developmental stuttering. Neuroreport 6: 501-505.
  25. Braun AR, Varga M, Stager S, Schulz G, Selbie S, et al. (1997) Altered patterns of cerebral activity during speech and language production in developmental stuttering. An H2(15) O positron emission tomography study. Brain 120: 761-784.
  26. Ghaderi AH, Andevari MN, Sowman PF (2018) Evidence for a Resting State Network Abnormality in Adults Who Stutter. Front Integr Neurosci 12: 16.
  27. Busan P, Del Ben G, Bernardini S, Natarelli G, Bencich M, et al. (2016) Altered modulation of silent period in tongue motor cortex of persistent developmental stuttering in relation to stuttering severity. PLoS ONE 11: e0163959.
  28. Gabriel J Cler, Saloni Krishnan, Daniel Papp, Charlotte E E Wiltshire, Jennifer Chesters, et al. (2021) Elevated iron concentration in putamen and cortical speech motor network in developmental stuttering. Brain 144(10): 2979-2984.
  29. Szelag Elżbieta, Garwarska Kolek D, Herman A, Stasiek J (1993) Brain lateralization and severity of stuttering in children. Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis 53. 263-267.

https://www.high-endrolex.com/21