Clinical Risk Factors of Stomal Recurrence in Patients
Requiring Emergency Tracheostomy for Advanced
Laryngeal Cancer
	 Volume 1 - Issue 4
		
		C Ndiaye1*, H Ahmed1, EJR Palou2, E S Diom1, S Maiga1, MW Barry2, N Pilor1, A Mbaye1, N Ndour1 and IC Ndiaye1
		
		
		
		      - 
                
				Author Information
Open or Close
                
				
				
- 1 ENT Department in FANN Teaching Hospital, Dakar, Senegal
- 2 ENT Department in Diamnadio’s Children Hospital, Dakar, Senegal
 *Corresponding author:  Gary Nishioka, Willamette Ear Nose and Throat & Facial Plastic Surgery, Oregon, USA
				 
 
 
 
 
			
			
			
				Received: February 04, 2019;   Published: February 12, 2019
             
      DOI:  10.32474/SJO.2019.01.000119
			 
			   		
			   
			    Full Text
			   Full Text
			   
			   
			    PDF
			   PDF
			   
			   
				To view the Full Article    Peer-reviewed Article PDF
		
		Abstract
Background: The aim of this work is to study the impact of tracheostomy on peristomal recurrence in patients undergoing
primary laryngectomy.
Methods: This was a retrospective study from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2013. All patients with laryngeal cancer classified
T3 or T4 were included. The patients were divided into 2 groups. One group was formed by patients underwent tracheostomy then
primary laryngectomy, the « T+LT » group. Second group was constituted by patients underwent primary laryngectomy « LT only ».
The tracheostomy, the subglottic extension, the resection margins and the tumor stage were studied. The exact Fisher test was used
to compare the variables. A value of p < 0.05 was significant.
Results: Ninety four patients were enrolled in this study. The «T + LT» group represented 61.7% (n = 58) and the «LT only»
group 38.3% (n = 36). Peristomal recurrences represented 25% of recurrences. Patients in both groups did not differ by age (p =
0.53), sex (p = 1), tumor stage (p = 0.8) and lymph node extension (p = 0.87). The tracheostomy (p = 0.73), the advanced stage (p =
0.15), the pathological resection margins (0.68) and the subglottic extension (0.35) were not associated with recurrence peristomal.
Conclusion: Tracheostomy is not a risk factor for peristomal recurrence after primary laryngectomy. In the unavailability of a
laser, the ENT surgeon is able to perform a tracheostomy without compromise the patient’s prognosis.
Keywords: Laryngectomy; Peristomal Recurrence; Laryngeal Cancer
 Keywords: Laryngectomy; Peristomal Recurrence; Laryngeal Cancer 
 
        
       
		
				    
        
Abstract|
Introduction|
Methods|
Results|
Discussion|
Conclusion|
References|