email   Email Us: info@lupinepublishers.com phone   Call Us: +1 (914) 407-6109   57 West 57th Street, 3rd floor, New York - NY 10019, USA

Lupine Publishers Group

Lupine Publishers

  Submit Manuscript

Research Article(ISSN: 2644-1209)

The Primary and Final Outcomes of Endoscopic and External Dacryocystorhinostomy for Treating Dacryocystitis: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

Volume 2 - Issue 3

Wenshuang Xu1,2,5, Jianqi Xiao1, Yongjie Zhang3, Yunhai Tu4, Xiaofeng Zhang1, Xiaoxia Wu2, Jinglin Cui1, Jing Li5, Monica M Jablonski6, Weikuan Gu5, Yan Jiao5* and Hong Chen1*

  • Author Information Open or Close
    • 1Center of Integrative Research, The first Hospital of Qiqihar City, China
    • 2Department of Ophthalmology, Qiqihar Wuguan Hospital, China
    • 3Department of Ophthalmology, Jiaxing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, China
    • 4Department of Orbital and Oculoplastic Surgery, Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, China
    • 5Department of Orthopedic Surgery and BME-Campbell Clinic, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, USA
    • 6Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, USA

    *Corresponding author: Yan Jiao, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, USA Hong Chen, Center of Integrative Research, The First Hospital of Qiqihar City, China

Received:June 07, 2019;   Published:June 14, 2019

DOI: 10.32474/TOOAJ.2018.02.000137

Full Text PDF

To view the Full Article   Peer-reviewed Article PDF

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effect of endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy (EN and EX-DCR) for treating dacryocystitis in Chinese adult population.

Methods: A retrospective, multi-center case series was conducted. A total of 185 eyes out of 167 patients suffered from either chronic or acute dacryocystitis were enrolled in this study. Patients were treated in one of the three regional hospitals from January to December of 2016. The patients were reviewed for demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and management outcome. The primary surgery success was defined as having an anatomical success without any revision surgery. The final surgery success was defined as having an anatomical success after all surgeries (including repeated surgeries).

Results: Enrolled patients included a total of 112 eyes out of 102 patients who underwent EN-DCR, and 73 eyes out of 65 patients who accepted EX-DCR. The primary surgery success rate was 89.29% (100/112) for EN-DCRs and 89.04% (65/73) for EX-DCRs. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no statistical difference in primary surgical outcomes between these two approaches, with a log rank X2 of 0.369 (P=0.543). Repeated EN-DCR was accepted by the patients with primary surgical failures in both EN- DCR (12/12) and EX-DCR (8/9) groups, leading the final surgical success rate of the EN-DCR and EX-CR group at 97.32% and 97.26%, respectively. The final surgical success rate was statistically significantly higher than the primary success rate in each group.

Conclusion: N-DCR is a valid alternative to external procedure in the management of dacryocystitis in the Chinese adult population, because of the comparable primary success rate to external approach and the unique advantages in treating the patients that need repeated surgeries.

Abstract| Introduction| Materials and Methods| Results| Discussion| References|

https://www.high-endrolex.com/21