ISSN: 2637-6695
Muslim Shah1*, Lubna Naz2, Tehmina Taj2, Roqia2, Saheefa Taj2 and Irum Latif2
Received: April 27, 2020; Published: May 11, 2020
Corresponding author: Muslim Shah, Associate Professor, Rehman College of Nursing, Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar KP, Pakistan
DOI: 10.32474/LOJNHC.2020.02.000150
Objective: The aim of this study was to know about knowledge and practices of nurses regarding standard precautions in tertiary care hospital, Peshawar, KP.
Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among nurses in a tertiary care hospital Peshawar. Participants were selected from different units by using random sampling technique. Data was collected by using adopted and modified questionnaire.
Results: The participants of study were 94 in which 13.8% were male and 86.2% were female. The overall knowledge and practices of participants were calculated in percentages. 50% participants were had average practice while 39.4% participants had poor knowledge. For identifying association of different variables chi square test were applied. Association between knowledge and gender was significant p=0.044 with the SD=0.347.
Conclusion: The current study which was conducted in tertiary care hospital, focused on knowledge and practice of nurses regarding standard precautions. Results significantly appeared to show that nurses had poor knowledge of standard precautions as compared to practices. The study also recommended the proper sessions for in service educations for nurses.
Hospitals associated infections or nosocomial infections are the
major issue of health care work setting. The issue of health care
associated infections has always been one of the most important
public health problems in many countries throughout the world
contributing to morbidity, mortality, and additional cost [1]. A
study conducted by [2] showed that half (50%) of the respondents
reported no knowledge of universal precautions; more than one
third (37%) had average knowledge of universal precautions while
13% had good knowledge. Knowledge of universal precautions
was highest among women than men, and among nurses (85.5%)
compared with other health workers. Another study conducted
by [3] stated that the large percentages of correct responses to
the items about knowledge of standard precautions (range for
individual items, 83.9%-99.2%), whereas the percentages of those
about knowledge of isolation precautions were seen much smaller.
Only 10.8% and 17.8% of respondents had correct answers about
the use of N95 mask and the safe distance from patients with
droplet spread disease. The findings of another study showed that
most nurses had a poor knowledge (43%), an average practice
(42%), and a moderate attitude (37%) about hospital associated
infections control. No statistically significant association was
observed between knowledge and practice [4].
Chandak [1] conducted a study at New Delhi showed that the
knowledge of nurses of standard precautions in prevention of
HAI was quite low. Knowledge of the participants in prevention
of hospital acquired infections improved significantly after three
days training session. Pre-test only 8.9% had responded correctly.
Post-test correct response rate for standard precautions increased
to 70%. A study conducted by [2] highlighted that knowledge and
attitude scores toward standard precautions were above 90%, but practice score was 50.8%.The majority of the Health Care Workers
(HCW) had poor knowledge of injection safety and complained
of inadequate resources to practice standard precautions. House
officers, laboratory scientists and junior cadres of nurses had lower
knowledge and compliance with standard precautions than more
experienced doctors and nurses. The study also showed that there
was some association of knowledge and practice with experience.
The more experience, the greater the knowledge and highest level
of its practice in clinical setting. The purpose of this study was to
identify and explore knowledge and practice of nurses regarding
use of standard precautions in tertiary care hospital Peshawar.
a. What do nurses know regarding standard precautions.
b. Do nurses practice standard precautions in clinical area.
Quantitative descriptive cross-sectional study was used in this research project. It was conducted through the April-May 2018 in public tertiary care hospital Peshawar.
Population for this study was registered nurses, working in tertiary care hospital Peshawar.
Simple random sampling technique was used for sample selection in this research project to access to nurses of the hospital.
Sample size was calculated by Rao soft software, population size was 285 with the margin of error 5% and non-responsive rate 10% and calculated sample size is 94.
An adopted and modified questionnaire was used for data collection. The questionnaire included demographic characteristics of nurses. The questionnaire consists of two parts. Part A regarding assessing the knowledge and part B about assessing the practice of nurses regarding standard precautions Figure 1. Part A (knowledge) contains total of twelve questions while part B (practice) consists total of 14 questions. Both knowledge and practice categories questions have three possible answers of “Yes” “No”, and “don’t know”. The respondents were divided into categories Table 1.
Figure 1: Total participants were 94, response rate was 100%. All participants were registered nurses among which 13(13.8%) were male and 81 (86.2%) were female, highlighted in Figure 1.
i. Setting: This research project was conducted in tertiary
care hospital Peshawar, KP as a large public hospital and true
representative of this province.
ii. Ethical Consideration: Written permission was obtained
from Nursing Director of the hospital. Informed consent was
distributed among participants of this research project and
confidentiality was maintained throughout the study.
iii. Inclusion Criteria: All registered nurses who were directly
involved in patient care
iv. Data Analysis: Statistical Package for Social Sciences
(SPSS) version 21 used for data analysis. In descriptive statistics
percentages and frequencies were calculated for ordinal and
nominal data. Chi Square test was applied to see association
among different variables Table 2.
Table 2: Among participants of this study 66(70.2%) were general nursing diploma holder, 23 (24.5%) were BSN, 1 was (1.1%) MSN and 4(4.3%) were having different specialties.
v. Results: To identify association between knowledge about standard precaution and sex of the participants Chi-square statistical test was applied which was significant with P-value of 0.044, no association was noted among other demographic variables with knowledge Table 3.
Table 3: In knowledge category 39.4% participants have poor knowledge 38.3% have average knowledge and 22.3% have good knowledge about standard precautions.
The results of current study showed that 39.4% participants of this study have poor knowledge, 38.3%have average and 22.3% have good knowledge. While in practice 26.6% have poor, 50% have average and 23.4% participant have good practice of standard precautions. No significant association was observed between knowledge and practice Figure 2. Similar results were found in a study conducted by [4]. The findings of study showed that most nurses had a poor knowledge 43%, an average practice 42% and a moderate attitude 37% about hospital associated infections control Table 4. No statistically significant association was observed between knowledge and practice. Results of the current study identified the association between gender and knowledge that men has highest knowledge than women with the mean 1.86 SD 0.347 and P-value 0.044, which is inconsistent with the results of the study conducted by [5] which showed that women has highest knowledge about standard precaution than men. Current study showed that there is no association of knowledge and practice with experience. However, in contrast a study conducted by [2], there was some association of knowledge and practice with experience. The more experience the greater the knowledge and highest level of its practice in clinical setting Figure 3.
Table 4: In practice category results showed that 26.6% have poor practice, 50% have average practice and 23.4% good practice of standard precautions.
Figure 2: 32(34%) were Medical Teaching Institute (MTI) employees, 12 (12.8%) were institutional employees and 50 (53.2%) were Director General (DG) employees as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 3: Age of participants were categorized in four classes,18-23years participants were 11 (11.7%), 24-29 years participants were 45 (47.7%), 30-34 years were 19 (20.2%) and >35 years participants were 19 (20.2%). Given in Figure 3.
In current study in knowledge category only 22.3% have good
knowledge about standard precautions. While In practice category
results showed that23.4% nurses have good practice of standard
precautions, which suggests some needed recommendation in
certain areas including:
i. To conduct certified workshops on nurse’s awareness
regarding blood born infections because of blood transfusions.
ii. To conduct workshops on contact body fluids precautions
that is the proper use of gloves, gowns, and masks.
iii. To bring awareness in nurses regarding proper sharps
disposals, its importance, and correct techniques of used
syringes disposals.
This study was conducted in one of public hospital of KP to assess knowledge and practice of nurses regarding standard precautions. Written permission for conducting study was obtained from nursing director of the hospital. Informed consent was distributed, and data was collected from a sample of 94 nurses which was calculated by Rao Soft software. After data collection data was analyzed by SPSS, percentages, frequencies were calculated. Association of different variables was checked by applying statistical test. Association was identified between knowledge and gender. In service education and continuous training was recommended for improvement of knowledge and practice of nurses regarding standard precautions.
Editorial Manager:
Email:
Bio chemistry
University of Texas Medical Branch, USADepartment of Criminal Justice
Liberty University, USADepartment of Psychiatry
University of Kentucky, USADepartment of Medicine
Gally International Biomedical Research & Consulting LLC, USADepartment of Urbanisation and Agricultural
Montreal university, USAOral & Maxillofacial Pathology
New York University, USAGastroenterology and Hepatology
University of Alabama, UKDepartment of Medicine
Universities of Bradford, UKOncology
Circulogene Theranostics, EnglandRadiation Chemistry
National University of Mexico, USAAnalytical Chemistry
Wentworth Institute of Technology, USAMinimally Invasive Surgery
Mercer University school of Medicine, USAPediatric Dentistry
University of Athens , GreeceThe annual scholar awards from Lupine Publishers honor a selected number Read More...