email   Email Us: info@lupinepublishers.com phone   Call Us: +1 (914) 407-6109   57 West 57th Street, 3rd floor, New York - NY 10019, USA

ISSN: 2637-6660

Archives of Nanomedicine: Open Access Journal

Research Article(ISSN: 2637-6660)

Reduced Graphene Oxide Via Green Route Exposure of Gamma (γ) Ray for Surface Morphological Investigation Volume 1 - Issue 2

Force Tefo Thema*

  • Material Science department, University of South Africa, South Africa

Received: May 04, 2018;   Published: May 22, 2018

*Corresponding author: Force Tefo Thema, Material Science department, university of South Africa, South Africa

DOI: 10.32474/ANOAJ.2018.01.000106

Abstract PDF

Abstract

γ-ray radiation was used to reduce graphene oxide thin films to partially reduced graphene oxide films at ambient conditions. Micro-Raman spectroscopy showed that irradiation of GO with γ-rays did not change the structure of graphene. The γ-rays are only active on the oxygen functional groups bonds because they are short and highly energized wavelengths. γ-rays penetrate the C-C lattice isotropically hence sustaining the graphene layer structure. This results in transparent and intact r-GO thin films with no structural defects. The defects on the structure would result to the opaqueness of the C-C lattice hence compromising the transparency of the material. The Scanning electron microscopy, Transmission Scanning electron, Fourier transform infrared and Raman spectrometry are presented.

Abbrevations: ITO: Indium Tin oxide, TCOs: Transparent Conducting Oxide, GFs: Graphene flakes, FE-SEM: Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope, TEM: Transmission Electron Microscope, GO: Graphene oxide, FTIR: Fourier Transform Infrared

Introduction

Indium Tin oxide (ITO) has been for so many years used as a transparent and conductive material on our mobile phones and television screens. However, since ITO is expensive and environmentally harsh it is therefore, critically important to come up with an alternative material that will replace it. This material should be environmentally friendly, cost effective and much more efficient and accessible. Graphene which is a competitive candidate is atomically thick, two-dimensional platelets featuring carbon atoms in a honeycomb arrangement. These sp2-hybridized sheets of carbon possess a host of desirable properties, including high mechanical stiffness (1 TPa) [1-2], good thermal conductivity (5000Wm_1 K_1) [3-6], and excellent charge carrier mobility (250 000cm2 V_1 s_1) [3]. As such, graphene has been studied for use in a variety of applications that exploit these properties [7-10] ranging from gas sensors [6] to lithium-ion battery electrodes [11- 14] as well as transparent conducting oxide (TCOs) type electrodes. Current reduction methods for producing colloidal graphene for graphene based electrodes from graphene oxide typically afford Nano sheets with high C/O ratios (∼10) [15] that exhibit good electrical conductivity and optical transparency.

Graphene flakes (GFs) and carbon nanotubes are very promising for molecular sensors, single-electron transistors, super capacitors, non-volatile memory devices, integrated circuits, atomic scale switches and other carbon based electronic and magneto-electronic devices [16-18]. Graphene in particular exhibits outstanding properties in various novel applications [19-23]. Specifically, sensing is arousing continuous interests due to the low background noise and the excellent surface activity [24,25], targeting to employ them in practical application. Various graphene Nano sensors have been fabricated in previous works [26-28]. The industrialization and commercialization of graphene Nano sensors require the preparation of graphene in quantity. Several methods have been used to synthesize graphene, among which, there is the reduction of graphene oxide which is a promising path toward high-yield production of graphene. It is however, known that the negative influence rendered by this method, that is the defective graphene structure, hinders the application in the field requiring excellent conductivity such as transparent conductive film [2].

Chemical reagents are fundamental to the reduction of GO. For instances, hydrazine hydrate (H2O4) which is used to reduce GO to r-GO is poisonous and toxic to human life. Taking sensing into consideration, the introduction of chemicals is a serious disadvantage because the intrinsic response of graphene to trace analyte may be masked by the signals caused by the impurities [29]. Therefore, a reduction method without impurities involved should be developed. Herein, we report on facile and environmentally friendly reduction method to synthesis a well-dispersed graphene from graphene oxide as a conductive and transparent dye solar cell electrode. This contribution reports on the synthesis of reduced graphene coatings for TCOs type applications in Gratzel dye solar cells and the description of some fundamental reactions taking place during the reduction phase.

Characterization

The surface measurements were recorded with a JEOL 7500F field emission Scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM). Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images were obtained on Fei Tecnai G2-20 operated at 200kV using an energy filter of 20eV. The Chemical and crystalline nature on the wings was analysed with the Perkin Elmer spectrum 100 (FT-IR) in the transmission mode operating with the wave number range of 400-4000 cm-1 at a scan speed of 0.20cm/s and a resolution of 4cm-1. Raman spectra were carried out using Horiba Jobin Yvon HR 800 model DU 420AOE with power of 20m Watts at an excitation wavelength of 514.5 nm with an argon ion laser from 100 to 4000 cm-1. Gamma ray with Co60 source type GIK-9-4, S/N 08398 and 56 TBq was used.

Experimental Methods & Results

Raw Materials

Natural graphite flakes (Bay carbon) were bought from Germany. 98 % Sulphuric acid (H2SO4), Potassium permanganate (KMnO4), Sodium nitrate (NaNO3), 30 % Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) were locally purchased from Sigma Aldrich. All chemicals were of analytical grade reagents and were used without any further purification

One-Step Synthesis Of Graphene Oxide (Go)

5g of commercial graphite flakes (Bay Carbon) was added to 3.8g of sodium nitrate while 169 ml of sulphuric acid (H2SO4) was slowly added in agitated ice bath. 22.5g Potassium Permanganate (KMnO4) was also added while agitating for an hour maintaining the temperature below 20 oC. The solution was cooled for 2hrs, then removed from ice bath and allowed to stand for five days in a gentle stir at temperature below 20 oC. A highly viscous liquid was produced. As prepared solution was added with 498 ml distilled water and 1.4ml sulphuric acid was slowly added in this viscous liquid while agitating for 1 hour. Stirring continued for two hours and a liquid turned brown. 15ml of 30% Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) was slowly added and stirring continued for another two hours while effervescence was observed. This resulted in brownish solution of Graphene oxide (GO).

GO Reduction

The GO thin films on SiO2/Si glass substrates were directly irradiated using a Co60 γ-ray source at dose rate of 6 Gy min-1 at ambient conditions.

Results and Discussion

The short wavelength and high energy γ-ray interaction with deionized water (d-H2O) produces excited electrons, ions and molecules which reduce GO. The number of layers of exfoliated graphene oxide and the concentration of graphene sheets is not dependent on the γ-rays induced but rather on the quality of graphene oxide synthesized and the fabrication of the thin film. The GO is not totally reduced as this is a very difficult task hence reduced graphene oxide (r-GO).

Scanning Electron Microscope

The morphological properties of the fabricated GO thin films were investigated by Scanning electron microscopy. Figure 1 shows SEM images of a typical large area GO and r-GO film transferred onto SiO2/Si substrates. The SEM images show that the vacuum filtration method produces GO and r-GO thin films which are of uniform thickness and large surface area. When there is chemical conversion of GO to r-GO, holes and defects are easily produced on the carbon grid. This could be attributed to the fact that these holes are a result of removal of oxygen functional group species during the reduction process [30]. But for the γ-ray reduction, that does not seem to be the case because the γ-rays are short wavelengths that are only active and penetrate on the carbon bonds without causing any structural damage. This is demonstrated by ultrathin and homogenous graphene film. However, r-GO image shows rippled graphene layer instead of completely flat layer. This could be attributed to the removal of water from the graphitic gallery.

Figure 1: SEM images (with 80 000xmag) of a large surface area GO (a) and r-GO (b) thin films on a SiO2/Si substrate fabricated using vacuum filtration method.

Lupinepublishers-openaccessjournals-Nanotechnology-nanomedicine

Transmission Electron Microscope

The morphology and structure of the graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide were also studied by transmission electron microscope (TEM) analysis. The transmission electron microscope spectra of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide are presented in Figure 2a- 2c shows large GO sheets which were observed on the top of the copper grid. The most transparent and featureless regions are likely to be layer of GO. Different from bulk GO sheets, the reduced graphene oxide, r-GO sheets, are no longer totally flat and smooth but always exhibit some corrugation, where they resemble crumpled silk veil waves. Especially, any particular area of the particle shows considerable folding Figure 2b.

Figure 2: Transmission electron micrograph GO (a) and r-GO (b) thin films on a SiO2/Si substrate fabricated using vacuum filtration method (c) SEM image of graphene scrolled layers.

Lupinepublishers-openaccessjournals-Nanotechnology-nanomedicine

Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR)

As reported in Figure 3, the FTIR spectra of the pristine GO shows the presence of oxygen species represented by the hydroxyl groups (3050-3800cm-1), ketones groups (1600-1650cm-1), carboxyl groups (1650–1750 cm-1) and contribution from C-O and C=O groups (1100-1280cm-1). The presence of the sp2-hybridized C=C (1500-1600cm-1) in Pristine GO shows that some parts of the GO material is not completely oxidized. Reduction of GO to r-GO is shown by a decrease or complete disappearance of the following oxygen species (peaks) represented by hydroxyl groups (3050- 3800cm-1), ketones groups (1600-1650cm-1, 1750-1850cm-1). Ketones groups (1600-1650cm-1), carboxyl groups (1650-1750 cm- 1) in the 3.0kGy irradiated GO films.

Figure 3: Typical ATR-FTIR spectra of of GO and r-GO irradiated at different γ-ray doses.

Lupinepublishers-openaccessjournals-Nanotechnology-nanomedicine

The γ-ray treatment was carried at ambient conditions. Continued irradiation of GO films resulted in the reappearance of the following oxygen species represented by the presence of hydroxyl groups (3050-3800 cm-1), ketones groups (1600-1650cm-1), carboxyl groups (1650-1750c) and contribution from C-O and C=O (1100-1280cm-1). This crystal clearly indicates that -radiation can be used to partially reduce GO thin films at ambient conditions but cannot be used to completely reduce GO films to r-GO because -radiation can also break C-C bonds. The breaking of C-C and C=C bonds at ambient conditions results in the formation of C-OH, C-O-C and, C=O bonds. This then explains why graphene undergoes what is termed self-healing process (reorganizing itself to the sp3 hybridized electronic configuration).

Micro-Raman Spectroscopy Investigation

Raman spectroscopy is a non-destructive technique used to obtain structural information about carbon-based materials [31]. Raman spectra have two characteristic peaks of graphitic carbon material that is the first order D and G peaks and their overtones. This first order peaks arise from the vibration of sp2-carbon corresponding to 1355cm-1 and 1585cm-1 respectively. The D peak which represents the breathing mode of aromatic ring arising from the defect in the sample [32] has intensity always used to measure the magnitude of the disorder [32]. The G peak corresponds to the optical E2g photons at the Brillouin zone center resulting from both stretching of sp2 and carbon atoms in both rings and chains while the D peak is due to the breathing modes of the six-atom rings and requires a defect for its activation [33,34]. Figure 4 reports the room temperature Raman spectra at various gamma irradiation doses. The changes in the G band peak positions and the ID/IG ratio of the GO films upon irradiation in Table 1. A slight downshift of the G Peak positions from 1591cm-1 in GO to 1592cm-1 in GO irradiated with 300Gy/min gamma radiation showing that indeed GO was reduced to partially reduced graphene oxide.

Figure 4: Raman spectra of GO and r-GO irradiated at different γ-ray doses.

Lupinepublishers-openaccessjournals-Nanotechnology-nanomedicine

Table 1: The Raman D, G, ratio intensities of samples at different γ-ray doses.

Lupinepublishers-openaccess-Nanomedicine

Conclusion

We have therefore, shown for the first time that γ-radiation can be used to reduce graphene oxide films using distilled water as aqueous media. We propose that the γ-rays break C-O bonds of the carbonyl, carboxylic and the hydroxyl group of the graphene oxide matrix leaving the graphene film intact. The SEM images demonstrate ultrathin and homogenous GO and r-GO films. TEM shows the thermodynamic stability of the 2D membrane as a result from microscopic crumbling via bending or buckling. This phenomenon also supports that the coarse aggregates have been exfoliated completely. FTIR analysis show reduction at 3kGy and reappearance of oxygen functional groups at 6kGy when carbon lattice undergoes self-healing process. The Raman shows the reduction of GO with a more ordered carbon structure at 3 and 4.5kGy irradiated samples.

References

  1. Murugan, L Zhang, K Karthikeyan, K Yun (2013) Surface activation of graphene oxide nanosheets by ultraviolet irradiation for highly efficient anti-bacterials 25(39).
  2. C Lee, X Wei, JW Kysar, J Hone (2008) Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Sci 321(5887): 385-388.
  3. K Karthikeyan, V Murugan, Z Ling-He, Y Kyusik, K Sang Jae (2012) Antibacterial Efficiency of Graphene Nanosheets against Pathogenic Bacteria via Lipid Peroxidation. Phys Chem C 116(32): 17280-17287.
  4. AA Balandin, S Ghosh, W Bao, I Calizo, D Teweldebrhan, et al. (2008) Superior Thermal Conductivity of Single-Layer Graphene. Nano Lett 8(3): 902-907.
  5. K Kaviyarasu, E Manikandan, M Maaza, S Neelamani, R Sivam, et al. (2015) Well-Aligned Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Decorated with Zinc Oxide Nanocrystals for High Performance Photocatalytic Application. Inter J of Nanoscience 14(3): 8.
  6. M Orlita, C Faugeras, P Plochocka, P Neugebauer, G Martinez, et al. (2008) Heer Approaching the Dirac Point in High-Mobility Multilayer Epitaxial Graphene. Phys Rev Let 101: 267601.
  7. E Manikandan, EG Kavitha, J Kennedy (2014) Epitaxial zinc oxide, graphene oxide composite thin-films by laser technique for micro- Raman and enhanced field emission studyCeramics. Inter 40: 16065- 16070.
  8. H Chen, MB Muller, KJ Gilmore, GG Wallace, D li (2008) Mechanically Strong, Electrically Conductive, and Biocompatible Graphene Paper. Li Adv. Mater.20(18): 3557-3561.
  9. S Stankovich, DA Dikin, GHB Dommett, KM Kohlhaas, EJ Zimney, et al. (2006) Graphene-based composite materials.Nat 442: 282-286.
  10. Wang C, Li D, Too CO, Wallace GG (2009) Electrochemical Properties of Graphene Paper Electrodes Used in Lithium Batteries Chem. Mater 21: 2604-2606.
  11. S Park, RS Ruoff (2009) Chemical methods for the production of graphenes. Nat Nanotechnol 4 (4): 217-224.
  12. FT Thema, MJ Moloto, ED Dikio, NN Nyangiwe, L Kotsedi, et al. (2013) Synthesis and Characterization of Graphene Thin Films by Chemical Reduction of Exfoliated and Intercalated Graphite. Oxide J Chem, p. 6.
  13. FT Thema, MJ Moloto, ED Dikio, NN Nyangiwe, L Kotsedi, et al. (2013) Synthesis and Characterization of Graphene Thin Films by Chemical Reduction of Exfoliated and Intercalated Graphite Oxide. Proceedings of the Nano Science and Technology Institute 1: 13-16.
  14. Y Ren, N Yan, Q Wen, Z Fan, T Wei, et al. (2010) Asymmetric Supercapacitors Based on Graphene/MnO2 and Activated Carbon Nanofiber Electrodes with High Power and Energy Density. J 21(12): 2366-2375.
  15. ST Yang, JX Li, DD Shao, J Hu, XK Wang (2009) J Mater 166: 109-116.
  16. AK Geim (2009) Graphene: status and prospects. Sci 324: 1530-1534.
  17. CNR Rao, AK Sood, K Subrahmanyam, SA Govindaraj (2009) Angew Chem Int Ed 48: 7752-7777.
  18. ST Yang, Y Chang, H Wang, G Liu, S Chen, et al. (2011) Cao Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by graphene oxide. J Colloid Inter Sci 353(2) 588-592.
  19. S Chandra, S Bag, P Das, D Bhattacharya, P Pramanik (2012) Fabrication of magnetically separable palladium-graphene nanocomposite with unique catalytic property of hydrogenation Chem Phys Lett 519: 59-63.
  20. H Zhang, X Lu, Y Li, Y Wang, J Li (2010) P25-Graphene Composite as a High Performance Photocatalyst. ACS Nano 4(1): 380-386.
  21. F He, J Fan, D Ma, L Zhang, C Leung, et al. (2010) The Attachement of Fe3O4 nanoparticles to grahene oxide by covalent bonding, Carbon 48: 3139-3144
  22. WS Hummers, RE Offenman (1985) Preparation of Graphitic OxideJ Am Chem Soc 80(6): 1339.
  23. P Benito, M Herrero, FM Labajos, V Rives, C Royo, et al. (2009) Production of carbon nanotubes from methane: use of Co-Zn-Al catalysts prepared by microwave-assisted synthesis. Chem Eng J 149(3): 455-462.
  24. IS IIjima (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354: 56-58.
  25. S Ayoob, AK Gupta, VT A Bhat (2008) Crit Rev Environ Sc Technol 38: 401-470.
  26. K Zhang, V Dwivedi, C Chi, J Wu (2010) Graphene oxide/ferric hydroxide composites for efficient arsenate removal from drinking water. J Hazard Mater 182:162-168.
  27. T Robinson, G McMullah, R Marchant, P Nigam (2001) Environmental Bioremediation of Dyes by Pseudomonas aeruginosa ETL-1 Isolated from Final Effluent Treatment Plant of Ankleshwar. Bioresour Techno 77(3): 247-255.
  28. E Forgacs, T Cserhati, G Oros (2004) Removal of synthetic dyes from wastewaters: a review. Environ Int 30(7): 953-971.
  29. ST Yang, S Chen, Y Chang, A Cao, Y Liu, et al. (2011) Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by graphene oxide. Colloid Int Sci 359(1): 24-29.
  30. Y Yu, LL Ma, WY Huang, FP Du, JC Yu, et al. (2005) Carbon 43(3): 670.
  31. S Xu, L Yong, P Wu (2013) One-Pot, Green, Rapid Synthesis of Flowerlike Gold Nanoparticles/Reduced Graphene Oxide Composite with Regenerated Silk Fibroin As Efficient Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalysts ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(3): 654-662.
  32. AC Ferrari, J Roberson (2000) Interpretation of Raman spectra of disordered and amorphous carbon. Phys Rev 61: 14095-14107.
  33. F Tuistra, JL Koenig (1970) Raman Spectrum of Graphite J Chem Phys 53: 1126-1130.
  34. K Reimann, K Syassen (1989) Raman scattering and photoluminescence in Cu2O under hydrostatic pressure. Phys Rev 39: 1113-1119.
Close

Online Submission System

Drag and drop files here

or

Browse Files
( For multiple files submission, zip them in a single file to submit. For file zipping software Download )