In a recent article, Tian et al. [1] reported about the
echocardiographic and pathological findings in 9 fetuses with
left ventricular hyper trabeculation/non-compaction (LVHT).
We have the following comments and concerns. The authors
differentiate between non-compaction cardiomyopathy (NCCM)
and left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC). In our view these are
two different terms which describe the same entity. Which is the
difference between NCCM and LVNC in the authors’ view? Absence
of additional cardiac abnormalities should not be a differentiating
criterion.
We do not agree that ultrastructural investigations of noncompaction
cardiomyopathy have not been carried out so far [1].
In a recent review we found 11 studies in which ultrastructural
investigations of the compacted and non-compacted myocardium in
LVHT patients have been carried out [2]. Did the authors carry out
interobserver investigations? Which was the variability between
the observers? How often did different investigators agree and
how often disagree on the diagnosis of LVHT in the fetuses? LVHT
occurs familiarly in relatives of LVHT index patients [3]. Were first
degree relatives of these 9 fetuses investigated for LVHT? Was LVHT
particularly present in the mothers of these 9 fetuses? We find it
unethical to propose termination of a pregnancy in case the fetus
is diagnosed with LVHT. LVHT is not a life-threatening disorder.
The majority of LVHT patients live a satisfactory and fulfilling life
over years. Though parents should be informed about the possible
complications of LVHT, termination of the pregnancy should not be
proposed to them.
Recently it has been reported that LVHT develops in females
during pregnancy [4]. Were also the pregnant females of the 9
carriages investigated echocardiographically? The authors talk
about “muscle biopsy”. Do they mean biopsy of the skeletal muscle
or biopsy of the myocardium? If they mean myocardium the term
“muscle biopsy” is misleading. We do not agree that LVHT was first
described by Engberding in 1984. In a previous study we provided
evidence that LVHT was first described by Feldt et al. 1969 and
possibly even earlier [5]. What happened to the two fetuses of
which the pregnancy was not terminated? Are they still alive?
Did they develop any complication of LVHT, such as ventricular
arrhythmias, systolic dysfunction or stroke / embolism? Did
postnatal echocardiography confirm the intrauterine finding of
LVHT? For how long were these two patients followed-up? Did
patient B in case 8 undergo autopsy? Was LVHT found on autopsy
in this patient as well?
LVHT in children is most frequently due to chromosomal
defects [6]. Were the 7 fetuses undergoing autopsy investigated
for chromosomal aberrations? Subendocardial fibrosis is a
frequent feature in the non-compacted layer of LVHT patients [7].
Was subendocardial fibrosis found in any of the 7 histologically
investigated patients? Right ventricular hyper trabeculation
should not be assessed since the right ventricle is physiologically
hyper trabeculated. LVHT is frequently found in patients with
mitochondrial disorders [8]. Were the mitochondrial changes on
ultrastructural investigations attributable to primary mitochondrial
dysfunction or a secondary effect? Were biochemical investigations
also carried out? Were any of the fetuses tested for mtDNA
mutations? Overall, this interesting case series could substantially
profit from the presentation of additional data which eventually
could help to clarify the still elusive pathogenesis of LVHT.