In a recent article Alston et al. reported about a male neonate
with mitochondrial disorder (MID) due to the novel homozygous
mutation c.275A>G in the SDHD gene [1]. The only affected organ
in this boy was the heart [1]. We have the following comments
and concerns. In the vast majority of the cases noncompaction,
also known as left ventricular hypertrabeculation (LVHT), is
congenital [2] and LVHT can be detected already prenatally by
fetal echocardiography [3]. Which was the reason why LVHT was
recognised neither on fetal echocardiography nor on fetal cardiac
MRI and not before postnatal echocardiography? Since it is quite
unusual that LVHT is missed on echocardiography and cardiac
MRI it can be speculated that it developed after the last cardiac
imaging at gestation week 32. Were fetal echocardiographies and
fetal cardiac MRI reviewed after detection of LVHT on postnatal
echocardiography and autopsy?
Reasons for missing LVHT on echocardiography could be that
the investigating examiner is not familiar with the entity, that he
does not depict the apex carefully, that the left ventricle is severely
dilated, that there is marked thickening of the left ventricular
myocardium, as in the presented patient, or that there are
abnormalities mimicking LVHT, such as intraventricular thrombus
formation, apical type of left ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial
calcification, aberrant bands, or intraventricular abscess [4].
LVHT may not only be associated with mutations in mtDNA
genes, nuclear genes encoding for the mitochondrial proteome
or the TAZ gene, but also in the dystrophin, DMPK, α-DTNA, RYR1,
ITGA7, MYH7B, LAMP2, GAA, GBEI, MADD, COL7A1, MMACHC,
PMP22, FXN, b-globin, PLEC1, GLA, NKX2-5, MYH7, LDB3/ZASP,
ACTC1, TNNT2, MYBPC3, TPM1, TNNI3, LMNA, and SCN5A genes
[5]. Though LVHT is most frequently associated with mutations in
mitochondrial genes [6], it cannot be excluded that the described
patient also carried a second mutation in one of the many other
genes associated with LVHT.
Since LVHT occurs familiarly, it would be interesting to know if
the parents or other relatives of the boy were investigated for LVHT
and if LVHT was found in any other family member? Of particular
interest is if relatives who also carried the SDHD mutation also
presented with LVHT. Simultaneous occurrence of the mutation and
LVHT would be a strong argument for a causal relation. Arguments
against a causal relation, however, are that LVHT is associated with
mutations in a huge number of different genes, that it occurs only
in a small number of mutation carriers, and that family members
of a patient with LVHT often present with cardiac abnormalities
other than LVHT, such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilative
cardiomyopathy, or arrhythmias. Overall, this interesting case could
be further up-valued by clarifying if LVHT was already present
prenatally, which other family members were carrying the mutation
and had LVHT, if organs other than the heart were affected, and if
the index case had a double trouble.
Since LVHT is often complicated by stroke/embolism,
ventricular arrhythmias, heart failure, or sudden cardiac death, the
described patient might have died from one of these intricacies.