Sociology as a Science
Volume 1 - Issue 4
Sherzod Salimov1* and Khuchkarov Vakhob Khashimovich2
-
Author Information
Open or Close
- 1Head department of the Scientific and Enlightenment Complex named after the First President the Republic of Uzbekistan Islam Karimov,
Tashkent, Uzbekistan
- 2Scientific researcher, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
*Corresponding author:
Sherzod Salimov, Scientific researcher, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Received: September 17, 2018; Published: September 21, 2018
DOI: 10.32474/LOJMS.2018.01.000120
Full Text
PDF
To view the Full Article Peer-reviewed Article PDF
Abstract
In the time of Enlightenment, the idea of science was to promote the Good society. There was yet not perceived to be a
contradiction in science between at the same time being objective and progressive. A century ago, though philosophers and scientist
discovered the problem language poses for science: there is a difference between the world and the words. The response from the
scientist was paradoxically to defend objectivity. Thus, when sociology was established as a science around the year 1900 it became
inherently contradictory, i.e., at the same time being objective and geared at social reforms. (cf. Lindgren 2011) In this article is
attempted an outline of a possible solution to this problem in terms of hermeneutics and phenomenology. The conclusion is: by
taking understanding as the point of departure sociology can be progressive: promoting the good society and still be a science.
Keywords: Sociology; Science; Society; Post-Modernism; Positivism; Post-Positivism; Phenomena; Meaning; Language
Abstract|
The Good Society|
Understanding and Thinking|
Is or Ought|
What is is?|
Phenomena and Meaning|
The meaning of society|
Refrences|