Comparative Study of Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent
Assay (ElISA) and Rapid Test Screening Methods on HIV,
HBsAg, HCV and Syphilis among Voluntary Donors in
Owerri, Nigeria
Volume 2 - Issue 3
Okorie HM1, Obeagu Emmanuel Ifeanyi1*, Okpoli Henry Chijindu Henry2 and Chukwu Stella Nchekwubedi3
- 1Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Imo State University, Owerri, Nigeria
- 2Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Achievers University, Nigeria
- 3Department of Nursing Science, Ebonyi State University, Nigeria
Received: July 18, 2020 Published: August 07, 2020
Corresponding author:Obeagu Emmanuel Ifeanyi, Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Imo
State University, Owerri, Nigeria
DOI: 10.32474/JCCM.2020.02.000137
Fulltext
PDF
To view the Full Article Peer-reviewed Article PDF
Abstract
A comparative study of Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and rapid test screening method on HIV, HBV, HCV and
syphilis among voluntary donors was investigated on 350 subjects in Owerri. They were 250 males and 100 females, all ranging
from the age of 21-50 years. Transfusion transmissible infections (TTIS) are the major problem associated with blood transfusion.
Accurate estimates of risk of TIIS are essential for monitoring the safety of blood supply and evaluating the efficacy of currently
employed screening procedures for immunodeficiency virus (HIV 1 and 2) hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HVC) and
syphilis using both enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and rapid test screening method. For HIV 1 & 2 screening test, the
female donors shows significant increase (P<0.05) between the ELISA and Rapid test method while there is no significant increase
(P>0.05) between the ELISA and rapid test method for male donors. Hepatitis B virus screening test shows a significant increase
(P<0.05) between ELISA and rapid test method for female donors, while there is no significant increase (P>0.05) between the two
methods for male donor. Also hepatitis C Virus screening test shows a significant increase (P<0.05) between the two methods for the
female donors and shows no significant increase (P>0.05) for male donors. However, there is significant increase (P<0.05) between
ELISA and rapid test method for syphilis screening test among female donors while there is no significant increase (P>0.05) for the
male donors. This study shows that there is a difference between the two test method, hence indicated that 30(8.57%) infected
units of blood would have been transfused due to false negative results with rapid test method. It was found in this study that
prevalence of TTIs were high in females than the males.
Keywords:ELISA; Rapid test; HIV; Hepatitis; Syphilis; Blood transfusion
Abstract|
Introduction|
Materials and Methods|
Results|
Discussion|
References|