Optimization of Waste Discharge Points in
Natural Streams
Volume 2 - Issue 5
Ezeilo FE1 and Agunwamba JC2*
-
Author Information
Open or Close
- 1Department of Civil Engineering, Rivers State University of Technology, Nigeria
- 2Department of Civil Engineering, University of Nigeria, Nigeria
*Corresponding author:
Saha Dauji, Nuclear Recycle Board, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India & Homi Bhabha National Institute,
Mumbai, India
Received: August 09, 2018; Published: August 28, 2018
DOI: 10.32474/TCEIA.2018.02.000148
Full Text
PDF
To view the Full Article Peer-reviewed Article PDF
Abstract
This paper reports on a study carried out to optimize the locations of multiple discharge points in a receiving stream, Amadi
creek, so as to minimize the impact of oxygen demanding resources (BOD) on water quality. The study evaluated the water
quality changes as a result of the increasing human and industrial activities around the creek. Water quality standards require
the maintenance of dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration of 5mg/l or more at any time in streams. However practical analysis of
the water samples from Amadi creek reveal a DO level as low as 2.3mg/l. The DO deficit was computed from data generated by
sampling DO concentrations along the creek from various points of waste discharge downstream while the BOD of the stream was
determined by monitoring BOD of samples obtained along the creek. The study also identified and quantified the amount of effluent
entering the creek from various point sources. The DO deficit equations are solved by the methods of simple calculus (classical
optimization), which simplifies the mathematical solution of the model equations by avoiding difficult to evaluate integrals Two
scenarios were identified and used to investigate the effect of BOD on the DO level in the stream, using mathematical simulation
techniques. Simulation results show that to ensure minimum impact of BOD on water quality waste discharge locations should be
placed at the optimal locations of 10015.382m and 6992.282m upstream and downstream waste discharge points respectively, at
an optimum DO deficit of 4.135mg/l for case 1.
For case2, the waste discharge locations are to be placed at optimal locations 40995.43m, 30665.17m, 41233.69m upstream
and downstream waste discharge points respectively at an optimum DO deficit of 4.567mg/l. This means that if a new waste input is
proposed for a stream its BOD input and its proposed location with respect to other inputs are important in order to determine the
effect on the DO level in the stream Discharges from the second treatment plant would result in decreased dissolved oxygen level for
a substantial distance downstream. This can have significant effects for streams and rivers with many influent waste streams over
their course, as the dissolved oxygen (DO) will not have a chance to recover between each influent stream, resulting in significantly
depressed oxygen levels .The dissolved oxygen (DO) deficit becomes zero at approximately the same distance downstream for both
cases, though the two point source discharge case (case2) shows a higher short term DO deficit. This can cause problems if they DO
concentration drops below the stipulated levels for the creek, leading to possible death of fish and other aquatic lives. It is therefore
recommended that industrial establishments planning to site their treatment facilities along rivers or streams should be compelled
to discharge their waste stream in compliance with the optimal locations with respect to any existing plant, so as to avoid undue
dissolved oxygen (DO) depletion.
Keywords: Point Sources; Effluent; Discharge Point; Impact, Creek; Optimal Location; Sampling
Abstract|
Introduction|
Brief Description of the Study Area|
Methodology|
Effect of Flow conditions on Single Point Source Discharge|
Effect of Flow Conditions on Two Sequential Point
Source Discharge|
Conclusions and Recommendations|
References|