A 65-year-old woman had been presented with 2 weeks right
lumbar pain and history of two UTI in the past 6 months. On U/S
examination, there was a clearly visible hyperechoic stone in the
central part of the right kidney w/o any obstruction. The CT scan
had proved 14.1 x 6.9mm asymmetrical stone stucked in central
pelvis with post-inflammatory changes around it. (Figure 1). The
patient had allergy on Indomethacin, Ibuprofen and other nonsteroidal pain killers indicating long-lasting and recurrent painful
urological troubles. The open pyelolithotomy was suggested to
prevent fragmentation with scattered residual stones with possible
additional sandwich therapy and UTI to follow. Through regular
intercostal right sided incision, the perirenal area was reached,
but the kidney was encapsulated in the firm envelope of irregular
connecting tissue. The pelvis was not identified until the fragile
ureter was detached from bulky fibrous lump. Even now the stone
could not be palpated, and renal vessels prevented straight entering
the renal hilus. Bowed stone extractor was used to grab the stone
without actually seeing it and after alignment long stone axis to the
pelvic opening, it was smoothly removed not causing any further
harm. After stone removal, the suture of the ureter on the pelvic
brim was virtually impossible, since no pelvis wall was identifiable
and ureteral stump was considerably short and irregular. The
reconstructive approach was adopted and the connective tissue
surrounding the presumed pelvis was closed with No. 1 Vicryl.
The Guillotine- like slice cut was done through the bottom third
of the right kidney to expose the neck of the lower calyx. After
parenchymal bleeding control, the ureteral stump was spatulated
and sewn over a 7 F double pig-tail stent onto the caliceal neck with
3-0 Vicryl tension-free. A Penrose drain was inserted for 4 days
and removed when dry. Indwelling catheter was removed after ten
days and patient was discharged. The CT scan after 6 months shows
the result (Figure 2). Uretero-calyceal anastomosis is not a frequent
reconstructive approach for the upper urinary tract and usually it
is not a planned procedure. It has its sense only if the kidney is
worth to be saved (if planned, no less then 20% of kidney function
should be seen on gamagraphy). [1-3] The feasibility of normal
pyelo-ureteral alignment may be difficult or impossible from
various reasons, mainly due to the local findings on surrounding
organs (“burried pelvis“ in this case stucked in firm scars after
previous UTIs, etc.). Two important points have to be beared in
mind regardless if done through open or laparoscopic approach:
the suture needs to be tension-free without urinary leakage postoperatively and both anastomotic endings must be well perfused.
No acute bleeding, especially from renal parenchyma, is permissive
when starting the anastomosis, since perianastomotic haematoma
may be compressive and hence ischemic on the both ends of
intended reconstruction. The draining stent should be extracted
in 3-4 weeks time, but post-operatively is very important to leave
indwelling catheter in the bladder at least for 10 days to prevent
anastomotic urinary leak resulting in later anastomotic stricture.