Email Us: info@lupinepublishers.com
Call Us: +1 (914) 407-6109
57 West 57th Street, 3rd floor, New York - NY 10019, USA
Lupine Publishers Group
Lupine Publishers
ISSN: 2641-1687
Research Article(ISSN: 2641-1687) 
Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy our Technique Description
Volume 3 - Issue 1Corona-Montes Víctor Enrique1,2,3,5*, González-Cuenca Eduardo1,2, Fernández-Noyola Gerardo2,5, Rueda-Loaiza Jesús Alejandro3, Ramírez-Muciño José Arturo4 and Vázquez-Lavista Luis Gabriel4,5
-
Author Information
Open or Close
Víctor Enrique Corona MontesHospital General de México/Centro Médico A.B.C. Observatorio/Hospital San Angel Inn Universidad, Unidad de Uro – Oncología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), México
Received: October 09, 2020; Published: October 21, 2020
DOI: 10.32474/JUNS.2020.03.000153
Full Text
PDFAbstract
Objective: To describe step-by-step technique in Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy of our transperitoneal posterioranterior technique for prostatic dissection with preservation of the endopelvic fascia, preservation of the puboprostatic ligaments and dorsal venous complex.
Materials and Methods: Description of our surgical technique over 80 patients who underwent RARP and the characteristics group from 2016 to 2019 excluding the rest of cases who went to different surgical approach and technique for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Results: The mean age was 63 years old, 7% of patients were overweight and 7.5% had obesity. The mean pre-operative prostate volume was 42.620 cc, mean prostatic specific antigen (PSA) of 10.414.8 ng/dl. The mean console time was 198±47. The surgical margins were positive in 13.75% of the patients. Complications were recorded in the peri-operative period, five (6.2%) Clavien-Dindo I and six (7.5%) Clavien-Dindo II.
Conclusions: After 8 years of experience in our center we have modified our technique of robot assisted radical prostatectomy, improving our results, following different worldwide concepts in the prostatic dissection. Even if necessary, to increase the number of cases we have find an easier way to reproduce with acceptable results.
Keywords: Robotic Radical Prostatectomy, Prostate Dissection, Transperitoneal Approach
Abstract| Introduction| Materials and Methods| Results and Discussion| Conclusion| Disclosure Statement| Conflict of interest statement| Fundingsource| Competing Interests| Authors’ Contributions| Acknowledgements| References|
-
Mark E Smith
Bio chemistry
University of Texas Medical Branch, USA -
Lawrence A Presley
Department of Criminal Justice
Liberty University, USA -
Thomas W Miller
Department of Psychiatry
University of Kentucky, USA -
Gjumrakch Aliev
Department of Medicine
Gally International Biomedical Research & Consulting LLC, USA -
Christopher Bryant
Department of Urbanisation and Agricultural
Montreal university, USA -
Robert William Frare
Oral & Maxillofacial Pathology
New York University, USA -
Rudolph Modesto Navari
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
University of Alabama, UK -
Andrew Hague
Department of Medicine
Universities of Bradford, UK -
George Gregory Buttigieg
Maltese College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Europe -
Chen-Hsiung Yeh
Oncology
Circulogene Theranostics, England -
.png)
Emilio Bucio-Carrillo
Radiation Chemistry
National University of Mexico, USA -
.jpg)
Casey J Grenier
Analytical Chemistry
Wentworth Institute of Technology, USA -
Hany Atalah
Minimally Invasive Surgery
Mercer University school of Medicine, USA -
Abu-Hussein Muhamad
Pediatric Dentistry
University of Athens , Greece
