Employment Status of Patients with ESRD and the
Subsequent treatment modalities in the United State
Volume 1 - Issue 4
John D Sullivan*
-
Author Information
Open or Close
- Boston University, Metropolitan College, United States
*Corresponding author:
John D Sullivan, Boston University, Metropolitan College, United States
Received: March 06, 2019; Published: March 11, 2019
DOI: 10.32474/JUNS.2019.01.000119
Full Text
PDF
To view the Full Article Peer-reviewed Article PDF
Introduction
End Stage Renal Disease impacts the lives of over 725,000
Americans and their families. In 1972, despite the cost of supporting
a rapidly growing chronic condition at the time, the United States
initiated a system whereby everyone would be treated that qualifies
for social security benefits, after a waiting period of three years
(Medicare Secondary Payer was slowly extended over the years to
36 months after diagnosis as it currently stands), regardless of age,
providing the platform for the debate of a potential nationalized
health care system that currently seems to be in a period of
uncertainty. However, over three decades through significant
consolidation, the treatment of dialysis via two large provider
chains (one fully integrated) have directed patients to hemodialysis
in the out-patient setting without considering the technological or
clinical benefits of home hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis [1,2].
Introduction|
Overview|
The Economics of Dialysis|
Profitability|
Conclusion|
References|