Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: Is Left Atrial
Appendage Closure Superior to Systemic Anticoagulation?
Volume 2 - Issue 1
Nadeev Wijesuriya* and Syed Ahsan
-
Author Information
Open or Close
- Deparment of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, UK
*Corresponding author:
Nadeev Wijesuriya, Deparment of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, UK
Received: March 12, 2020; Published: April 01, 2020
DOI: 10.32474/LOJPCR.2020.02.000127
Full Text
PDF
To view the Full Article Peer-reviewed Article PDF
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia
worldwide [1], and has significant associated morbidity, including
increased risk of stroke. Stroke prevention in non-valvular AF
(NVAF) is a dynamic, rapidly evolving and challenging field. Oral
anticoagulation (OAC) is well established as the gold standard in
stroke prevention for patients meeting risk criteria defined by the
CHA2DS2-VASc score [2]. However, these patients are often elderly,
with multiple co-morbidities including ischaemic heart disease
(IHD), chronic kidney disease and frailty [3] which increase risk of
bleeding. Clinicians face daily conundrums on how to balance these
risks with the benefits of stroke protection. Left Atrial Appendage
closure (LAAC) is an emerging technology which some believe may
help to resolve these issues.
Introduction|
Oral Anticoagulation in Stroke Prevention|
Challenges of Oral Anticoagulation|
Left Atrial Appendage Closure as a Stroke
Prevention Strategy|
Perspective: Current and Future Directions for
LAA Closure|
References|