Primary Gastric Conduit Cancer 10 Years after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

PET activity Abstract Primary gastric conduit cancer (GCC) is a known but rare occurrence post-esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction of the esophagus. As improvements in post-esophagectomy treatment and surveillance have increased patient survival, GCC is becoming more common, with a reported incidence of 0.2-3.5%. We present the case of a 76-year-old man with metachronous adenocarcinoma of the gastric conduit antrum 10 years after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma. He was treated by a total gastrectomy with colonic interposition for esophageal reconstruction.


Introduction
Surgical management of esophageal cancer involves esophagectomy with esophageal reconstruction. Creation of a gastric conduit is the preferred approach for reconstruction due to the stomach's rich blood supply, length, and ease of transposition [1][2][3]. Esophageal cancer is associated with a risk of second primary malignancies of the gastrointestinal tract with an incidence of 8-12% [1,[3][4][5]. Gastric conduit cancer (GCC) is defined as a metachronous cancer in the gastric conduit used for esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy [3,4]. As improvements in post-esophagectomy treatment and surveillance have increased patient survival, GCC is becoming more common, with a reported incidence of 0.2-3.5% [1,[4][5][6][7]. This is the case of a 76-year-old man with metachronous adenocarcinoma of the gastric antrum 10 years after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma.
He was treated by a total gastrectomy with colonic interposition for esophageal reconstruction. Repeat PET scan showed interval improvement, and the decision was made forego a third cycle and proceed with surgery. The patient had a preoperative angiogram to evaluate the blood supply to the colon ( Figure 3).

Discussion
Primary gastric conduit cancer is a known but still rare occurrence post-esophagectomy. While potential causes of GCC are debated, three main theories are consistently mentioned in the literature. H. pylori infection is associated with an increased risk of developing gastric adenocarcinoma [8]. However, there is equivocal evidence that H. pylori infection is contributory to GCC.
A retrospective study by Bamba et al of 25 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma found only one patient with H. pylori detected in the resected gastric tube [1]. In a case report series by Ho et al, only one patient tested positive for H. pylori on the antrectomy specimen of the gastric tube despite a negative test on their pre-operative endoscopic biopsy [3]. The low incidence of H. pylori is attributed to chronic biliary reflux after pyloroplasty and is consistent with previous studies that looked at H. pylori infection in relation to GCC [4,6,9,10]. Our patient had a negative H. pylori test on his pre-op biopsy, and one was not performed on his post-op specimen. Chronic biliary reflux may itself increase the risk of GCC. Gastric reflux has a well-known association with esophageal metaplasia [11]. It is possible that bile reflux due to pyloroplasty increases the risk of intestinal metaplasia and resulting carcinogenesis [1,9,10]. Across several retrospective studies, GCC presented significantly more in the mid and lower third of the reconstructed esophagus [1,12]. suggests that exposure of the digestive tract to toxins, most notably tobacco or alcohol, may promote metaplasia and carcinogenesis [13,14]. There is evidence that tobacco, but not alcohol, increases the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma, particularly in patients with Barrett's esophagus [15]. Although our patient does not have a history of Barrett's esophagus, he has a 30-pack-year history. One interesting aspect of this patient's history is his initial diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Across 126 patients in several retrospective studies and case reports, only 2 patients were noted to have GCC after esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma.
This large discrepancy in the presenting esophageal pathology can be attributed to the epidemiology of esophageal cancer. In high risk geographical regions spanning from Northern Iran through central Asian to North-Central China, 90% of esophageal cancer cases are SCC [20,21]. In Western countries, the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma has been rising, while the incidence of SCC has been declining [22,23]. With the bulk of literature coming from Japan and other countries with a higher incidence of esophageal SCC, it is not surprising that there are fewer published reports of GCC in patients with a history of esophageal adenocarcinoma [1,[3][4][5][6][7][9][10][11][12][17][18][19][21][22][23]. Future studies are needed to explore potential differences in GCC between these two esophageal cancer pathologies.
Treatment of GCC is should be based on depth of tumor invasion and includes surgery, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and palliative chemoradiation [4,5]. Total gastric conduit resection is technically challenging, with a mortality reported up to 50% [5].
Complete surgical resection, as performed in our patient, consists of an esophagectomy with complete lymph node dissection and reconstruction of the GI tract with the colon or small bowel [5,19].
An alternative surgical option includes partial gastric resection for palliation [5,12]. More recently, ESD has become increasingly favored [17]. A retrospective study by Lee et al reported higher 3-year survival with ESD compared to gastrectomy and conservative chemotherapy (100 vs. 50 vs. 9.1). However, they do not report whether any patients who underwent ESD received induction therapy prior to their initial esophagectomy. A case reported by Ho et al described an unsuccessful ESD due to extensive tissue fibrosis in a patient with prior chemoradiation [3]. Our patient's history of induction chemoradiation was considered, and it is unlikely that ESD would have been successful. Despite the high rate of mortality associated with total gastrectomy, our patient is disease free 4 years after his surgery in a joint case by a thoracic and complex general surgical oncologist. This case reiterates the importance of longterm surveillance after esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction.
The median time between initial esophagectomy and detection of a second primary gastric cancer ranged from 57-86 months [1,12,17]. Our patient was symptomatic and presented with a gastric conduit cancer 10 years after his Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
While this exceeds the reported median times of presentation, his late presentation does not fall outside the realm of possibility given a 10-year incidence rate of 5.7-8.1% [1,17]. Most importantly, our patient's case makes an argument for prolonged surveillance for up to 10 years after esophagectomy [1,5,19,24].

Conclusion
Cancer of the gastric conduit after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer has been increasing in incidence as treatment and surveillance improves. Our case of a 76-year-old man with adenocarcinoma of the gastric conduit 10 years after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma provides learning value and suggests there may be benefit to long-term surveillance of these patients.