Analysis of Marginal Bone Loss and Implant Success Rate After Implant Implantation Volume 7 - Issue 1

Hee Ja Na¹ and Moon Sil Choi²*

¹Department of Dental Hygiene, Honam University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea

²Department of Dental Hygiene, Songwon University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea

Received:October 21, 2021;   Published: November 01, 2021

*Corresponding author: Moon Sil Choi, Department of Dental Hygiene, Songwon University, Republic of Korea

DOI: 10.32474/IPDOAJ.2021.07.000253

Fulltext PDF

To view the Full Article   Peer-reviewed Article PDF

Abstract

Purpose: Patients with prosthesis-equipped post-implantation prosthesis performance were continuously observed, revealing the association of marginal bone loss with gender and age implant success and survival rates during a 1year study of clinical prosthesis placement; with results used as a reference for implant procedures and prognosis.

Methods: This study was conducted on 31 patients from January to February 2021 at Y Dental Hospital in Gwangju, with 20 men and 11 women equipped with prosthetics after implant procedure a year earlier. The subjects of the study were carried out with the G-power program, and 31 subjects were extracted. The distance from the shoulder of the implant to the attachment point of the dichotomous bone was measured at the center of the area of atrophy, checking both from the mesial region to the distal region using a radiation ruler taking photos with endocardial radiation as well as panoramic images. The subjects of the implant study were analyzed by age, gender, cause of release, duration of implant, implant length, implant width, implant assembly period, osteoplasty type, shield presence, match with corresponding teeth, implant survival symptom, implant success rate symptoms, and 1mm loss within a year. This study was conducted after approval.

Results: As a result of testing the contribution and statistical significance of individual independent variables to dependent variables, at a significance level of 0.05, the independent variable loses 1 mm at a ratio of (t=5.473, p=.00) in 5.473, p=.000). This loss significantly affects implant success rates.

Conclusions: Recognizing the importance of bone loss management within a year after implant procedure, dental staff and patients can achieve higher success and survival rates after implant procedure if they can be thoroughly managed within a year.

Keywords:Implant formula; marginal bone loss; success rate; survival rate; implant peripheral inflammation; Implant prosthesis

Abstract| Introduction| Materials and Methods| Results| Discussion| Conclusion| Conflict of Interest| Acknowledgement| References|