email   Email Us: info@lupinepublishers.com phone   Call Us: +1 (914) 407-6109   57 West 57th Street, 3rd floor, New York - NY 10019, USA

Lupine Publishers Group

Lupine Publishers

ISSN: 2641-6794

Open Access Journal of Environmental & Soil Science

Research Article(ISSN: 2641-6794)

Effect of Interaction Between Ag Nanoparticles and Salinity on Germination Stages of Lathyrus Sativus L. Volume 2 - Issue 2

Seyed Saeid Hojjat1,2*

  • 1 Research Center for Plant Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
  • 2Center of Excellence in Nanotechnology, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand

Received: January 28, 2019;   Published: February 06, 2019

Corresponding author: Seyed Saeid Hojjat, Research Center for Plant Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

DOI: 10.32474/OAJESS.2019.02.000132

Abstract PDF

Also view in:

Abstract

The aim of the study was to effect of interaction between Ag nanoparticles and salinity on Germination Stages of Lathyrus Sativus L. Treatments included in the study were viz. To 3 levels of salinity (0 as control, 8 and 16 dS/m NaCl), 8 and 16 dS/m and four levels of silver nanoparticles (0, 5, 10 and 15 ppm) on grass pea seed were tested. An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), on the seed germination factors, root and shoot length (RL and SL) and proline content of grass pea Survival under Salinity Levels. Results showed a significant reduction in growth and development indices due to the salinity stress. The salt stress impaired the germination factors of grass pea seedlings. The application of Ag in combination improved the germination percentage, shoot and root length, seedling fresh weight and seedling dry weight and seedling dry contents of grass pea seedlings under stressed conditions. The results suggest that Ag nanoparticles enhancement may be important for osmotic adjustment in grass pea under salinity stress and application of Ag mitigated the adverse effect of salinity and toxic effects of salinity stress on grass pea seedlings.

Keywords: Ag nanoparticles; Salinity; Germination Stages; Grass Pea; Lathyrus Sativus L.

Introduction

High salinity is a common abiotic stress factor that causes a significant reduction in growth. Germination and seedling growth are reduced in saline soils with varying responses for species and cultivars [1]. Soil saltiness may impact the germination of seeds either by causing an osmotic potential outside to the seed averting water uptake, or the poisonous effects of Na+ and Cl− ions on germinating seed [2]. Salt and osmotic stresses are responsible for both inhibition or delayed seed germination and seedling establishment [3]. The majority of our present-day crops are adversely affected by salinity stress [4]. NaCl causes extensive oxidative damage in different legumes, resulting in significant reduction of different growth parameters, seed nutritional quality, and nodulation [5,6]. To mitigate and repair damages triggered by oxidative stress, plants evolved a series of both enzymatic as well as a non-enzymatic antioxidant defense mechanism. Ascorbate and carotenoids are two important non-enzymatic defenses against salinity, whereas proline is the most debated osmoregulatory substances under stress [7].

Lathyrus Sativus L. (Grass pea) is an annual pulse crop belonging to the Fabaceae family and Vicieae tribe [8]. Grass pea has a long history in agriculture. The crop is an excellent fodder with its reliable yield and high protein content. This plant is also commonly grown for animal feed and as forage. The grass pea is endowed with many properties that combine to make it an attractive food crop in drought-stricken, rain-fed areas where soil quality is poor and extreme environmental conditions prevail [9]. Despite its tolerance to drought it is not affected by excessive rainfall and can be grown on land subject to flooding [10,11]. Compared to other legumes, it is also resistant to many insect pests [12-15]. Nanoparticles (NPs) are wide class of materials that include particulate substances, which have one dimension less than 100 nm at least [16]. The importance of these materials realized when researchers found that size can influence the physiochemical properties of a substance e.g. the optical properties [17]. NPs with different composition, size, and concentration, physical/ chemical properties have been reported to influence growth and development of various plant species with both positive and negative effects [18]. Silver nanoparticles have been implicated in agriculture for improving crops. There are many reports indicating that appropriate concentrations of AgNPs play an important role in plant growth [19,20]. The application of Nano silver during germination process may enhance germination traits, plant growth and resistance to salinity conditions in basil seedlings [21]. The use of Silver Nanoparticle on Fenugreek Seed Germination under Salinity Levels is a recent practice studied [22]. Nanomaterials have also been used for various fundamental and practical applications [23]. Although the potential of AgNPs in improving salinity resistance has been reported in several plant species [24,25], its role in the alleviation of salinity effect and related mechanisms is still unknown. Therefore, the main objective of this work was to study the effect of Silver Nanoparticles on salt tolerance in Lathyrus Sativus L.

Material and Methods

In order to investigate salinity stress on Lathyrus Sativus L. germination indices, an experiment was carried out in Iran from April to Juan 2017 at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, to creation salinity, sodium chloride at the levels of 8 dS/m, 15 dS/m and 0 (as control), four levels of silver nanoparticles (0, 5, 10 and 15 ppm) on Grass pea were tested. The Ag NPs were obtained from US Research Nanomaterial’s, Inc. Transmission electron microscopy (ТЕМ) images of silver nanoparticles with diameters of 20 nm, shown in Figure 1. Seeds of Lathyrus Sativus L. where from seed bank of Research Center for Plant Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. These all were washed with deionized water. Seeds were sterilized in a 5% sodium hypochlorite solution for 10 minutes [26], rinsed through with deionized water several times. Their germination was conducted on water porous paper support in Petri dishes (25 seed per dish) at the controlled temperature of 25 ± 1°C. After labeling the Petri dishes, seed were established between two Whatman No. 2 in Petri dishes. Silver nanoparticles in different concentration silver nanoparticles (0, 5, 10 and 15ppm) were prepared directly in deionized water and dispersed by ultrasonic vibration for one hour. Each concentration was prepared in three replicates. Every other day supply with 0.5 ml silver nanoparticles per every test plantlet was carried out for 21 days along with control. Germination counts were recorded at 2 days’ intervals for 21 days after sowing and the seedlings were allowed to grow. The germination percentages of the seeds were finally determined for each of the treatments. After 21 days of growth, the shoot and root lengths were long enough to measure using a ruler. The controlled sets for germinations were also carried out at the same time along with treated seeds (Figure 2).

Figure 1: Silver Nanopowder, Coated with ~0.2wt% PVP (Poly Viny Pyrrolidone) surfactant for low oxygen content and easy dispersing. True density: 10.5 g/cm3 Purity: 99.99% APS: 20 nm SSA: ~18-22 m2/g Color: black, Morphology: spherical.

lupinepublishers-openaccess-journal-environmental-soil-sciences

Figure 2: Effect of Ag Nanoparticles on Germination Stages of Lathyrus Sativus L. in Salinity level( 8 dS/m NaCl).

lupinepublishers-openaccess-journal-environmental-soil-sciences

Parameters Measured in this Study were:

A. Germination Stages

Total germination percentage (GT) was calculated as Gt = (n/N ×100), where n = total number of germinated seeds (normal and abnormal) at the end of the experiment and N = total number of seeds used for the germination test.

B. Germination Speed Index (GSI)

Conducted concomitantly with the germination test, with a daily calculation of the number of seeds that presented protrusion of primary root with length ≥2 millimeter, continuously at the same time amid the trial. The germination speed index was calculated by Maguire formula [27]: aguire formula (1962):

Where:

GSI = seedlings’ germination speed index;

G = number of seeds germinated each day;

N = number of days elapsed from the seeding until the last count.

Root and Shoot Length

Root length was taken from the point below the hypocotyls to the end of the tip of the root. Shoot length was measured from the base of the root- hypocotyl transition zone up to the base of the cotyledons. The root and shoot length were measured with the help of a thread and scale.

Seedling Vigour Index

The seedling vigor index was determined by using the formula given by Abdul baki and Anderson [28].

Fresh and Dry mass

The fresh mass was quantified through weighing on precision scale, and the dry mass was determined through weighing on a precision scale after permanence of the material in a kiln with air forced circulation, at a temperature of 70°C, until indelible weight. At the ending of the experiment, At the end of the experiment, radical and plumule length and fresh weight measured. Plants were placed in the oven at 70°C for 48 h and weighted with sensitive scale.

Proline Contents

Proline was determined spectrophotometrically following the ninhydrin method described, using L-proline as a standard [29]. Approximately 300 mg of dry tissue was homogenized in 10ml of 3% (w/v) aqueous sulphosalicylic acid and filtered. To 2ml of the filtrate, 2ml of acid ninhydrin was added, followed by the addition of 2ml of glacial acetic acid and boiling for 60 min. The mixture was extracted with toluene, and the free proline was quantified spectrophotometrically at 520nm from the organic phase using a spectrophotometer. Statistical analysis each treatment was conducted, and the results were presented as mean ± SD (standard deviation). The results were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with used Minitab Version 16.

Results and Discussion

The present study showed clearly that salinity had a negative effect on the yield and its components of grass pea. It is well known that seed germination provides a suitable foundation for plant growth, development, and yield [30]. Increased salt concentration caused a decrease in germination percent (Table 1). Seed germination decreased as the doses increased. The Strong reduction in germination (-47%) was observed mainly at the highest level of salt concentration as compared to control treatment. Delayed germination causes increased irrigation cost and irregular and weak seedling growth in the establishment of legume crops. Relevant results were reported by Gunjaca and Sarcevic [31] and Almansouri et al. [32]. They reported that increasing osmotic potential decreased water uptake and slow down germination time. The average time of germination increases with increasing levels of salinity. In view of mean germination time, there was a considerable increase in this character at 0 (as control), 8 and 16 DS/m salinity levels as compared to the others. Emergence was significantly affected by salinity levels. Moreover, many researchers have reported developmental delay of seed germination at high salinity [33]. The germination rate decreased as salt concentration increased to a 16 dS/m and delayed for the high salt dosage (Table 1). Since higher salinity limited water absorption, it has prevented nutrient assimilation, as a result, germination rate declined with increasing salinity. The findings from this study were like to the findings of Kaydan and Yagmur [34] and Akhtar and Hussain [35].

Table 1: The interaction effect of NaCl and AgNPs on Germination Speed Index.

lupinepublishers-openaccess-journal-environmental-soil-sciences

Table 2: Analysis of variance of the measured traits.

lupinepublishers-openaccess-journal-environmental-soil-sciences

Shoot fresh weight was significantly influenced (P<0.05) by salinity levels. The highest shoot fresh weight was obtained from 0dSm salinity level while the lowest weight was at 16dSm. Shoot fresh weight significantly decreased as salinity level increased above 8dSm (Table 2). Salinity stress significantly (P<0.05) affected shoot dry weight as the salt concentration dosage increased. Shoot dry weight significantly decreased in salt levels over 8dSm. When the salinity level was raised above, the proline content increased in grass pea. Culturing excised roots has demonstrated to be a really great test show for the early detection of tolerance to abiotic stresses such as saltiness [36-38].

Proline was studied in numerous works dealing with plant selection against abiotic stresses such as dry and salinity [39,40], and it may play a defensive part against the osmotic potential produced by salt [41,42]. The proline substance of the expanded with the NaCl concentration of the culture medium. At 16 dS/m NaCl, the proline concentration appeared a huge increment in reaction to salt stress, although the activity of the roots at this concentration was negligible, with no grateful longitudinal development. Proline, which happens broadly in higher plants and collects in bigger sums than other amino acids [43], regulates the aggregation of useable N. Proline collection normally occurs within the cytosol where it contributes significantly to the cytoplasmic osmotic alteration [44]. It is osmotically very active and contributes to membrane stability and mitigates the impact of on NaCl cell membrane disturbance [45]. In the present experiment application of Ag NPs enhanced seed potential by increasing the characteristics of seed germination (Tables 1 & 2). The results showed that the impact of Ag NPs was significant on germination percentage in P≤0. 05. The results about of this test appeared that utilization of Ag NPs nanoparticles can increment the germination in grass pea. Seed germination results indicate that Ag Nanoparticles at their lower concentrations advanced seed germination and early seedling growth in grass pea, anyway at higher concentration showed slight antagonistic impacts. Parameters of seed germination were expanded with increasing levels of Ag NPs up to 10 ppm. Among the treatments, application of 10 ppm of Ag NPs proved best by giving the highest values for percent seed germination, germination rate and germination mean time. It is well watched that the exogenous application of Ag NPs decreased the reduction of germination resulted from salt treatments. In the interim, the control treatments of salt and Ag nanoparticles gave the tallest plants contrasted with the other studied treatments. Darvishzadeh et al. [21] found that the utilization of Ag Nano particles at the concentration of 40 mg.kg-1 prompted the increases in germination percentage and improved the resistance to salinity conditions in basil. The proline content increased with increasing severity of salinity stress. Additionally, proline content significantly (P.0.01) increased when silver nanoparticles were applied in connected in serious saline stress in comparison without silver nanoparticles (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Effect of interaction between ag nanoparticles and salinity on germination stages of Lathyrus Sativus L. a - Main effects plot for Root length (mm); b - Main effects plot for dry weight of shoot and root (gr); c - Interaction Plot for fresh weight of shoot and root (gr); d - Interaction Plot for dry weight of shoot and root (gr); e - Interaction Plot for Proline (mg/gr).

lupinepublishers-openaccess-journal-environmental-soil-sciences

Conclusion

Salt stress through enhancement of osmotic pressure leads to the decrease of germination percentage, germination rate, germination index and an increment in mean germination time of Lathyrus sativus seeds. For overcoming the negative impacts of salinity on the plant growth and yield can be to attempt to new strategies. The dry and fresh weight of seedlings diminished as seedling length declined with increasing salinity levels since root number, shoot number, root length and shoot length decreased essentially. Results demonstrate that Ag NPs at lower concentration enhances seed germination, promptness index, and seedling growth. The positive effect of Ag on physiological properties was in conditions that the plant grew under salt stress was more increasingly exceptional in examination with the conditions that plant grown under normal conditions. The results of this study showed that Ag can be involved in the metabolic or physiological activity in higher plants exposed to abiotic stresses.

Acknowledgment

I would like to thank the Research Center for Plant Sciences, and Dr. Jafar Nabati for providing the necessary facilities.

References

  1. Hampson C, Simpson G (1990) Effects of Temperature, Salt, and Osmotic Potential on Early Growth of Wheat Triticum aestivum L. Germination. Canadian Journal of Botany 68(3): 524-528.
  2. Tavakkoli E, Rengasamy P, G McDonald (2010) High concentrations of Na+ and Cl– ions in soil solution have simultaneous detrimental effects on growth of faba bean under salinity stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 61(15): 4449-4459.
  3. Almansouri M, Kinet JM, Lutts S (2001) Effect of Salt and Osmotic Stresses on Germination in Durum Wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Plant and Soil 231(2): 243-254.
  4. Munns R (2005) Genes and salt tolerance: bringing them together. New Phytol 167(3): 645-663.
  5. Ahmad P, John R, Sarwat M, Umar S (2008) Responses of proline, lipid peroxidation and antioxidative enzymes in two varieties of Pisum sativum L. Under salt stress. Int J Plant Prod 2 (4): 353-66.
  6. Hernandez JA, Jimenez A, Mullineaux PM, Seviela F (2000) Tolerance of pea (Pisum sativum L.) to longterm salt stress is associated to induction of antioxidant defences. Plant Cell Environ 23(8): 853-862.
  7. Anoop N, Gupta AK (2003) Transgenic indica rice cv IR-50 overexpressing Vigna aconitifolia d (1) pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase cDNA shows tolerance to high salt. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology 12: 109-116.
  8. Biswas SC, Biswas AK (1997) Induced translocation heterozygosity and sterility in Lathyrus Sativus L. Bangladesh J Botany 26(2): 131-136.
  9. Palmer JD (1986) Isolation and structural analysis of chloroplast DNA. Methods Enzymol 118: 167-186.
  10. Rathod KL (1989) Status of Lathyrus Sativus L. In India with special reference to Madhya Pradesh, in Grass pea: Threat and Promise. Proceedings of the International Network for the Improvement of Lathyrus Sativus and the Eradication of Lathyrism (P.S. Spencer, ed.). Third World Medical Research Foundation, New York, pp. 168-174.
  11. Campbell C, Mehra RB, Agrawal SK, Chen YZ, Abd El Moneim AM, et al. (1994) Current status and future strategyin breeding grasspea (Lathyrus sativus). Euphatica 73: 167- 175.
  12. Tiwari KR, Campbell CG (1996a) Inheritance of neurotoxin (ODAP) content, flower and seed coat colour in grass pea (Lathyrus Sativus L.). Euphytica 91(2): 195-203.
  13. Tiwari KR, Campbell CG (1996b) Inheritance of seed weight in grass pea (Lathyrus Sativus L.). FABIS Newsletter 38/39: 30-33.
  14. Berger JD, Siddique KHM, Loss SP (1999) Cool season grain legumes for Mediterranean environments: the effects of environment on non-protein amino acids in Vicia and Lathyrus species. Aust J Agr Res 50(3): 403-412.
  15. Sillero JC, Cubero JI, Fernández Aparicio M, Rubiales D (2005) Search for resistance to crenate broomrape (Orobanche crenata) in Lathyrus. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter 4: 7-9.
  16. Laurent S, Forge D, Port M, Roch A, Robic C, et al. (2008) Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications. Chem Rev 108(6): 2574-2574.
  17. Khan I, Saeed K, Khan I (2017) Nanoparticles: Properties, applications and toxicities. Arabian Journal of Chemistry.
  18. Ma X, Geisler-ee J, Deng Y, Kolmakov A (2010) Interactions between engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) and plants: Phytotoxicity, uptake and accumulation. Sci Total Environ 408(16): 3053-3061.
  19. Hojjat SS, Hojjat H (2015) Effect of Nano Silver on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth in Fenugreek Seed. International Journal of Food Engineering 1(2): 106-110.
  20. Kaveh R, Li YS, Ranjbar S, Tehrani R, Brueck CL, et al. (2013) Changes in Arabidopsis thaliana gene expression in response to silver nanoparticles and silver ions. Environ Sci Technol 47(18): 10637-10644.
  21. Darvishzadeh F, Nejatzadeh F, Iranbakhsh A.R (2015) Effects of silver nanoparticles on salinity tolerance in basil plant (Ocimum basilicum L.) During germination in vitro. New Cellular and Molecular Biotechnology Journal 2(10): 63-70.
  22. Hojjat SS, Kamyab M (2017) The effect of silver nanoparticle on Fenugreek seed germination under salinity levels. Russian Agricultural Sciences 43(1): 61-65.
  23. Kolekar TV, Yadav HM, Bandgar SS, Deshmukh PY (2011) Synthesis by Sol-Gel Method and Characterization of Zno Nanoparticles. Indian Streams Research Journal 1(1): 1-4.
  24. Ekhtiyari R, Mohebbi H, Mansouri M (2011) The study of the effects of nano silver technology on salinity tolerance of (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.). Plant Ecosystem 7: 55-62.
  25. Younes B, Cilindre C, Villaume S, Parmentier M, Jeandet P, et al. (2011) Evidence for an extracellular acid proteolytic activity secreted by living cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae PlR1: Impact on grape proteins. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 59 (11): 6239-6246.
  26. US Environmental Protection Agency (1996) Ecological Effects Test Guidelines. OPPTS 850.4200. Seed Germination/Root Elongation Toxicity Test. EPA 712-C-96-154.
  27. Maguire J D (1962) Speed of germination - aid in selection and evaluation for seedling emergence and vigour. Crop Sci 2: 176-177.
  28. Abdul-Baki A, Anderson JD (1973) Vigor determination in Soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop Sci 13(6): 630-633.
  29. Bates L, Waldren RP, Teare ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil 39(1): 205-207.
  30. Qados Abdul AMS, Moftah AE (2015) Influence of silicon and Nanosilicon on germination growth and yield of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) Under salt stress conditions. Am J Soc Hortic Sci 5(6): 509-524.
  31. Gunjaca J, Sarcevic H (2000) Survival analysis of the wheat germination data. 22nd International Conference. Information Technology Interfaces ITI 2000. Pula, Croatia, pp. 307-310.
  32. Almansouri M, Kinet JM, Lutts S (2001) Effect of Salt and Osmotic Stresses on Germination in Durum Wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Plant and Soil 231(2): 243-254.
  33. Carvajal M, Cerdá A, Martinez V (2000) Does calcium ameliorate the negative effect of NaCl on melon root water transport by regulating aquaporin activity. New Phytol 145(3): 439-447
  34. Kaydan D, Yagmur M (2008) Germination, seedling growth and relative water content of shoot in different seed sizes of triticale under osmotic stress of water and NaCl. Afr J Biotechnol 7(16): 2862-2868.
  35. Akhtar P, Hussain F (2008) Salinity tolerance of three ranges grasses at germination and early growth stages. Pak J Bot 40(6): 2437-2441.
  36. Suzuki K, Okazaki K, Tawaraya K, Osaki M, Shinano T (2009) Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry associated global analysis of rice root exudates under aseptical conditions. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 55: 505-513.
  37. Marín ML, Marín JA (1998) Excised rootstock roots cultured in vitro. Plant Cell Reports 18(3-4): 350-355.
  38. Hossain Z, Mandal AK, Shukla R, Datta SK (2004) NaCl stress - its chromotoxic effects and antioxidant behavior in roots of Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. Plant Science 166(1): 215-220.
  39. Munns R, Tester M (2008) Mechanisms of salt tolerance. Annual Review Plant Biology 59: 651-681.
  40. Aziz A, Martin-Tanguy J, Larher F (1999) Salt stress-induced proline accumulation and changes in tyrosine and polyamine levels are linked to ionic adjustment in tomato leaf discs. Plant Science 145(2): 83-91.
  41. Hoque MA, Banu MN, Nakamura Y, Shimoishi Y, Murata Y (2008) Proline and glycinebetaine enhance antioxidant defense and methylglyoxal detoxification systems and reduce NaCl-induced damage in cultured tobacco cells. Journal of Plant Physiology 165(8): 813-824.
  42. Chen Z, Cuin TA, Zhou M, Twomey A, Naidu B P, Shabala S (2007) Compatible solute accumulation and stressmitigating effects in barley genotypes contrasting in their salt tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany 58(16): 4245-4255.
  43. Abraham E, Rigo G, Szekely G, Nagy R, Koncz C, et al. (2003) Lightdependent induction of proline biosynthesis by abscisic acid and salt stress is inhibited by brassinosteroid in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol 51(3): 363-372.
  44. Ketchum REB, Warren RC, Klima LJ, Lopez-Gutierrez F, Nabors MW (1991) The mechanism and regulation of proline accumulation in suspension cultures of the halophytic grass Distichlis spicata L J Plant Physiol 137: 368-374.
  45. Mansour MMF (1998) Protection of plasma membrane of onion epidermal cells by glycinebetaine and proline against NaCl stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 36(10): 767-772.
Close

Online Submission System

Drag and drop files here

or

Browse Files
( For multiple files submission, zip them in a single file to submit. For file zipping software Download )